prabhakar singh's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 21832

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

shivanand says : brief note on PTCL case
Dear sir, We have purchased 7 acre of land which was granted to one of shivappa kallappa naikmakkal in the year 1966 with a condition of non-alienation of the land for a period of 15 years. The grantee alienated the land during the year 1982 and 1985.which is after completion of 15 year.we is the 3rd purchaser of the land. The grantee filed a case with assistant commissioner dharwad (Karnataka),during the year 2005 stating that he belongs to HINDU VALMIKI caste which has been classified as scheduled tribe community there by lending to violation of clause 4(2) of the PTCL act with contention of resumption of land back to original grantee. The assistant commissioner dharwad heard the case and rejected the petition standing that the caste of the grantee has been classified as scheduled tribe community W.E.F 19/04/1991.the grantee filed and appeal to deputy commissioner dharwad during the year 2006-07 .the D.C dharwd has heard the case and upheld the judgment of AC dharwad. The grantee again preferred an writ petition to the High court of Karnataka during 2009 the court had heard the case and again remanded back to the case to the DC dharwad for hearing and for passing appropriate order. Now the case has been called for hearing by the DC on 25/02/2014. In regards to the judgment issued by the high court single and double bench the following points have been brought to perusal the constitution scheduled tribe order 1950 has been issued as per the provision of article 342 of constitution classifying the community under ST and several amendments have been issued to the presidential notification 1950 by adding caste of person inserted to the ST list w.e.f 19/04/1991 “Naik,Nayak,Beda,Bedar &valmiki” (constitution 2nd amendment 1991 copy and bill passed by Lok saba copy enclosed ) As states above caste every Amendments to presidential notification of 1950. Thre is a specific Effective date, month & year on which the caste for to be considered as ST. In such circumstances the judgments have been issued by the Hon’ble judges considering the caste added to the ST with “Retrospective effect” with revert back to the presidential notification 1950. Without considering the effect dates,month,&year of amendments by issue of judgments considering as Retrospective effect of 1950, injustice has been caused to the purchaser of the land there by resumption of purchaser land back to original grantee. In view of the above the necessary classification requires on the following points 1) Whether the constitution scheduled tribe all amendments & modification amendments are Retrospective or prospective? 2) On what bases the judgments have issued considering the constitution amendments to revert back to presidential notification 1950? 3) If the all amendments are Retrospective effect for this any of the notification issued in this regards? Dear sir kindly as soon as possible necessary legal advice on the above the doubts may please I communicated. We are waiting for kind advice Thanking you sir Shivanand m desai 9986980722

akshayvs says : please help ...its urgent
RESPECTED SIR I AM IN A VERY PROBLEMATIC SITUATION RIGHT NOW .LET ME PLEASE EXPLAIN MY STORY MY GREAT GRANDFATHER HAD 3 SONS AND HE DISTRIBUTED HIS LAND AMONGST THEM .OUT OF THESE 3 SONS ,ONE WAS MY GRANDFATHER WHO WAS A ALCOHOL ADDICTED PERSON. BY THE FEAR OF HE SELLING THE LAND FOR HIS ALCOHOL ADDICTION , MY GREAT GRANDFATHER TRANSFERRED THE LAND TO MY FATHERS NAME. THE 7-12 UTTARA HAS THE NAME OF MY FATHER ON IT AND NO ONE ELSE. WHEN THIS TRANSFER TOOK PLACE, MY UNCLE WAS NOT BORN AND HENCE HIS NAME WAS NOT MENTIONED ANYWHERE IN THE DOCUMENTS MADE BY MY GRANDFATHER. MOW MY UNCLE IS CLAIMING HIS RIGHT IN THIS PROPERTY AND DEMANDING 70 % PROPERTY AS HE IS UNEMPLOYED. DO HE REALLY HAVE ANY RIGHT OVER THIS PROPERTY ?? i need to sell that property for my future education but my dad is unwilling to give the property to me and my mother ; he want to give the property to his brother ....can i claim my right in this property ?

Pavan kumar says : Personal loan help
Sir, Iam pavan i live in chennai i took a personal loan of 2.5 lakhs before 6months i paid the emi for 4 months then my mother was admitted in hospital i spent around 6lakhs for her she was in ICU for 2months & now iam unable to pay the loan & my creditcard i dono what to do....iam the only one earning in my family ,i have a younger brother who is studying & my mom is also not well so i have manage all this with a monthly salary of 12k which iam unable to do anything right now can u tell me what should i do to escape from the bank people, iam getting scared were they'l file a complain with police on me pls suggest me what to do.

Pavan kumar says : Personal loan help
Sir, Iam pavan i live in chennai i took a personal loan of 2.5 lakhs before 6months i paid the emi for 4 months then my mother was admitted in hospital i spent around 6lakhs for her she was in ICU for 2months & now iam unable to pay the loan & my creditcard i dono what to do....iam the only one earning in my family ,i have a younger brother who is studying & my mom is also not well so i have manage all this with a monthly salary of 12k which iam unable to do anything right now can u tell me what should i do to escape from the bank people, iam getting scared were they'l file a complain with police on me pls suggest me what to do.

P Charan Gopal says : HAND OVER MY LAND
Respected sir this is charan messaging from AP Sir actually the problem is my grandfather is purchased land at Ongole in 1969 and got the registered.our documentes missed for

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799