prabhakar singh's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 21832

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Dr Sangh Mittra says : Limitation if any in Filing Writ Petition
Sir, The Section 4& 6 Notification were on 26.09.2007 and 25.09.2008. The Award was passed on 24.09.2010. I kept representing requesting for release of land. Got assuring replies. On 02.06.2014 I was told during my personal visit to Govt office that my case had been rejected on 01.03.2013 . Is filing Writ Petition within permissible period? Regards, Dr Roshni Justin drroshnijustin@gmail.com

gaurav rohilla says : challan
sir mera challan kt gya hai or mera abhi police me selection hona hai sir koi problem toh nhi hogi or helmet ka kta hai challan

gaurav rohilla says : challan
sir mera challan kt gya hai or mera abhi air froce me selection hona hai sir koi problem toh nhi hogi or helmet ka kta hai challan

aftab says : Dobule Registry
Hello Sir, My friend bought a plot by lady in 2012 and got mutation done, before buying that plot he check the papers and mutation which was on that lady name and she bought that Plot from a farmer, everything was in order. Now he came to know that property was sold to a society in 1991 by the farmer, there after society did plotting on it and sold it out to X parties. Now the X person who bought the same plot in 1991 showed up and claiming on it, although he do not have mutation for the same. Please guide how we start the case taking under consideration that property was bought for 25 lkh and in registry he mention circle rate at the time 10 lkh only. He did consult with lawyers in Lucknow and came to know that old registry which was done in 1991 is stronger and valuable than new one regardless even if he has mutation done. Court will accept old one and might reject new one which is done in 2012. Kind Regards, Aftab Ahmad

Subhash Chandra Tuteja says : property related civil suit
1/A Suit was filed in yr 2007 by gr A (two Brothers) on gr B(other Bro & Sis) for Title of a land area 0.59 acre. My Father C was also made a party who interfering in our family matter by insisting party B for partition with intention to grab the land. Gr A & B Compromised and got decree from lok adalat . 2/ Appeal instituted by gr B on gr A and my father was again made a party .Again Gr A & B Compromised and got decree from permanent lok adalat . 3/ Both case my father was ex parte (saman/notice was return with refusal of my father & witness were not our neighbour some one else ). 4/ my father purchased land area 0.59 acre from a zamidar in Yr1960 and also won the case against heir of zamidar in yr 1965. 5/Gr A & B Exhibit zamabondbust 1928-29 in which their g/father was mourski krishak and did not exhibit any other papers against disputed land .They exhibit another document(plain paper) sign by 14 village's persons for their possession since their g/father time. 6/ my father sold land area 0.03 acre in yr 1985 june to six persons whose other land was behind of this land for a path 12ft wide. Balance land area 0.56 acre was given to me against unregistered fmly settlement in yr 1985 july and got muted land in my name in yr 1987 . A pce of land sold for my sister marriage in yr1989 and two other parts were sold in yr 1995.the Balance land area 0.48 acre was in my name since then. 6/ In yr 2007 land was parted in 5 pieces & It was in the name of 11 persons in revenue recorded. they were not made a party. 7/ As balance land .48 acre was in my name since from 1995 I filed a suit in Feb yr 2009 against all above brother & sisters. Both lower Distt courts pass TITLE decree in my favour and null and void above decree for not making me a party in their suit. 8/ High court admitted the case and setting a substantial question of law ABOVE SAID DECREE (YR 2007) IS BINDING ON ME ALSO AS MY FATHER WAS A PARTY. 9/ Party A & B gave false statements in their synopsis/fact of case before H’ble HC are 1) My Father was made party as he was claiming it is his land. 2) In year 2000-01 the land was transfer in the name of party A & B from their G/father. 3) In case file by me Yr 2009 pleaded I am owner of the land area 0.59 acre Statement 1 never said before and statement 2 said in their origin suit (2007) and exhibit for another land hand written and sign by patwari which was also wrong (In 2000-01 this land was in my name). Statement 3 just to mislead they stated full land area 0.59 acre instead part land area 0.48 acre R/Sir , 1) As responded could not object at the time of admission of case but can it be objected letter on ? 2) If yes, Under What act we can put application? 3) In Decree yr 2007 my father was made a dummy & unimportant party as per their pleading. Can a title (compromised) decree will be binding on him? 4) Once both lower courts said the decree passed in 2007 is null & void then without discussion on its nullity can be the second question arises?

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799