KRittika Sagar 09 July 2020

when does accused become informant to the court

One party lodged an FIR before the police, the accused in the first FIR lodged a counter FIR and then the
first party got a notice from the court to appear before it on the FIR lodged by the accused in the first FIR. why the FIR of first party not taken by the court before the counter FIR.

Reply Follow

Quick Summary

This discussion explores the legal distinction between an accused person and an informant, particularly when counter-FIRs are involved. It clarifies that the informant is typically the one who lodges the initial FIR or provides information, while the accused is the one challenging it. The conversation touches upon why a court might prioritise a second FIR and whether police bias could be a factor, suggesting that understanding the specific facts and legal sections is crucial for determining the appropriate remedy.

3 Replies

KRittika Sagar 09 July 2020

why the person who lodged second FIR has been termed as an informant in the order sheet and the accused is petitioner. Also, is it police being biased to the person lodging first FIR ? Can we move an application in the court for the same. Though, the matter has been listed for mediation.

KRittika Sagar 09 July 2020

Thank you, sir. This information is useful.

(Guest)

Hi,

Informant means one who provides information. Like accused in the first FIR is informant in the second. Are you sure that the First FIR was also registered? (As you say the matter is sent for mediation, then it seems one like a family issue) Under what section is the second FIR registered? Remedy lies in knowing the facts and understanding where you are placed.

Regards,

Abhishek Tiwari