Criminal Trident Pack: IPC, CrPC and IEA by Sr. Adv. G.S Shukla and Adv. Raghav Arora
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 June 2010

THE MARRIAGE LAW BILL, 2010

Bill No. XXIII of 2010

AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA

ON THE 3RD MAY, 2010

THE MARRIAGE LAW BILL, 2010

A

BILL

 

to remove the discrimination between man and woman in the matter of marriage and divorce in the existing laws, to ensure   equality between them and confer dignity and humane treatment to women and to strengthen family and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.

Whereas, article 16 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights requires that every Member State should accord equal treatment to man and woman in the matter of marriage and divorce;

And whereas, article 15 of the Constitution of India prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion and s*x;

And whereas article 44 of the Constitution directs the State to enact uniform civil code which includes uniform law regarding marriage and divorce.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-first Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

Short title, commencement and applicability.

1. (1) This Act may be called the Marriage Law Act, 2010.

(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.

(3) it shall apply to all the citizens of India.

Definition.

2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and expressions used but not defined herein shall, mutatis mutandis have the same meanings respectively assigned to them in the laws relating to marriage and divorce which are in force at the time of the coming into force of this Act.

Restriction on marriage when spouse is alive.

45 of 1860.

3. (1) No man whose wife is living, shall marry another woman and no woman whose husband is living, shall marry another man except as expressly provided in this Act.

(2) Any marriage in contravention of sub-section (1) shall be void and the man or woman who marries in violation of sub-section (1) shall be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be punished for the offence of adultery under section 494 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Petition for divorce.

4. Subject to the provisions of this Act, and to the rules made there under, a petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court or the family court as the case may be, either by the husband or the wife on the ground that his wife or her husband as the case may be:—

(a) has after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary s*xual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse; or

(b) has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or

(c) is undergoing a sentence of imprisonment for seven years or more for an offence as defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860; or

(d) has since the solemnization of the marriage treated the petitioner with cruelty; or

(e) has been suffering from incurable and communicable disease which makes it unsafe for the spouse to live with him or her; or

(f) has been incurably of unsound mind, or has been suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the petitioner cannot be reasonably expected to live with the respondent.

Explanation.— In this sub-section;

(i) the expression "mental disorder" means mental illness, arrested or incomplete development of mind, psychopathic disorder or any other disorder or disability of mind and includes schizopherenia,

(ii) the expression "psychopathic disorder" means a persistent disorder or disability of mind (whether or not including subnormality of intelligence) which results in a abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the respondent, and whether or not it requires or is susceptible to medical treatment.

(g) has been suffering from any venereal disease in a communicable form including AIDS;

(h) has been suffering from leprosy, the disease not having been contracted from the petitioner; and

(i) has not been heard of as being alive for a period of seven years or more by those persons who would naturally have heard of the respondent, if the respondent has been alive.

Explanation.—In this sub-section, the expression "desertion" means desertion of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such party, and includes the willful neglect

of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage, and its grammatical variations and cognate expressions shall be construed accordingly.

Petition for divorce by wife.

5. A wife may also present a petition for divorce to the District Court on the ground that her husband has, since the solemnization of the marriage, been guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality.

Divorce by mutual consent.

6. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules made there under, a petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties together on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the district court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized under this Act, and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree declaring the marriage be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.

Restriction on presentation of petition for divorce.

7. No petition for divorce shall be presented unless as on the date of the presentation of the petition three years have elapsed from the date of marriage.

Second marriage with the permission of the court.

8. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, or in any other law for the time being in force:—

(1) A man can take a second wife with the consent of his wife and with the permission of the court which could be given on any one or more grounds on which divorce can be granted under section 4 of this Act or on the ground of physical disability caused on account of any accident or any illness or for any reasons whatsoever which renders her unfit for discharging her duties, responsibilities and obligations as the wife.

(2) In every petition for divorce presented by the husband under section 4 or for permission to take a second wife under section 9, if the court comes to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled to the decree of divorce on any one of the grounds on which it could be given under section 4, or permission to take a second wife could be granted under section 8, the court shall in the first instance pass a preliminary decree granting divorce or permission to take a second wife as the case may be.

(3) The wife against whom the preliminary decree is passed under section 8, shall be entitled to prefer an appeal against such decree except in cases in which she had given her consent, to the High Court within a period of thirty days from the date of the preliminary decree.

(4) It shall, however, be open to the wife not to prefer any appeal against such preliminary decree and to give consent to the husband to take a second wife and if, the wife files such consent before the court within thirty days from the date of the preliminary decree, the Court shall set aside the preliminary decree for divorce and grant permission to the husband to take a second wife.

(5) If neither an appeal is filed by the wife to the High Court nor the consent is filed, consenting to the husband taking a second wife within the prescribed period, the Court shall proceed to pass final decree for divorce: Provided that before passing final decree, the Court shall give paramount consideration to the interest of child/children of the petitioner and respondent and shall pass appropriate orders for the protection of their interest in every respect including their health, education and maintenance: Provided further that before passing a decree of divorce or appropriate orders which directly affects the children, the Court shall give notice and opportunity of hearing to the person who is interested in the welfare of the children of the spouse.

Permission to take a second wife on the application of the wife.

9. (1) A wife shall be entitled to file a petition before the District Court according permission to her husband to take a second wife only on the ground that she is medically certified as incapable of child bearing or she has been incapacitated for discharging her duties and obligations as required by a wife on account of any accident or any illness or for any reasons whatsoever.

(2) the permission under sub-section (1) shall be given by the Court if, the Court is satisfied that the application made, is out of her free will and desire and not on account of any force, fraud or undue influence brought to bear on her by the husband or any one on his behalf.

Maintenance allowance.

10. (1) In case, a permission is granted to a man to take a second wife under section 8 or 9 of the Act, the wife shall have the option either to live with the husband or to live separately and claim maintenance from the husband for herself and for her children, if any, from the husband, if she has no sufficient source of livelihood.

(2) The quantum of maintenance, however, shall be determined by the Court having due regard to the requirement of the wife and/or children and also having due regard to the financial capacity of the husband on an application made by the wife and/or children as the case may be.

Permission to take a second husband.

11. (1) A wife shall be, with the permission of the competent court, entitled to take a second husband if,—

(a) her husband has been convicted for an offence and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for more than seven years; or

(b) her husband is suffering from incurable and communicable venereal diseases including AIDS and thereby, incompetent and unsuitable to lead a conjugal life; or

(c) he joins ascetic order and shuns married life; or

(d) he is guilty of such cruelty which makes it impracticable to the wife to live with him; or

(e) he has been absconding for more than seven years; and

(f) he has been certified by a competent medical authority that he is impotent.

(2) Notwithstanding the taking of a second husband with the permission of the Courts on the grounds mentioned in this section, her right for any share in the property of her first

husband or any right flowing from her relationship with her first husband including the right of their children if any, shall remain unaffected.

(3) Whenever a petition is filed by a wife seeking permission to take a second husband, the court shall consider the grounds urged with great circumspection and grant permission after recording a finding that the ground has been made out beyond reasonable doubt.

Right in the property of the spouse to remain unaffected

even on taking second spouse.

12. In all cases in which permission is given to a man to take a second wife or permission is given to a woman to take a second husband their right to share in the property of the spouse concerned or any right flowing from the relationship as spouse including the right of their children if any, shall remain unaffected.

Jurisdiction.

13. Only the highest court of original civil jurisdiction in the district other than the High Court alone shall have jurisdiction to entertain and decide all the petitions presented under any of the provisions of this Act.

 

 

Presence during proceedings in the Court.

14. At the time of the proceedings of the Court, in each case only parties to that cases and their counsel and such other persons, with the permission of the court shall be present in the Court.

Appeal.

15. (1) An appeal shall lie to a Division Bench of the High Court against all or any of the orders passed by the Court having original jurisdiction both on questions of law and fact.

5 of 1908.

 (2) The High Court shall have all the powers of the first appellate Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 both in respect of making any interim order as well as passing the final orders.

Religious aspects of Marriage remain unaffected.

16. All religious aspects of the marriage in all the personal laws of the citizens belonging to different religions shall remain unaffected.

Act to have overriding effects. 26 of 1937.   8 of 1939.

17. The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained in any of the laws in force as on the date of commencement of this Act, including the Muslim Personal Law Application Act, 1937 and the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 and all the laws continued by virtue of Article 372 of the Constitution as also any usage, custom or practice.

Power to make rules.

18. (1) The Central Government shall have the power to frame rules after previous publication generally for carrying out the purposes of this Act.

(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters namely:—

(a) the procedure to be adopted by the Court in the petitions presented under the provisions of this Act;

(b) the form and manner in which any restriction, the type of restriction and particulars of information required to be entered in the registers, in respect of all the proceedings under the Act;

(c) fees that may be levied in respect of petitions and/or applications under the Act;

(d) manner in which public notice may be given in cases in which the whereabouts of the respondent is not known; and

(e) any other matters, which may be or required to be rescribed.

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

Prior to the date of commencement of the Constitution, there were different laws governing marriage and divorce as applicable to different classes of citizens. All those laws were continued by virtue of Article 372 of the Constitution insofar as they are consistent with the provisions of the Constitution. One of the main objectives of the Constitution as enshrined in the Preamble is that the State shall be secular and shall ensure equality for all citizens and to secure Social Justice. Article 14 is an injunction to the State not to deny equality before law. Article 15 in particular prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion or s*x.

Article 44 of the Constitution read with Article 37 of the Constitution makes it the fundamental duty of the State to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code. As held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.R. Bommai Vs. Union of India. 1994 (3) SCC1 it is part of secular character of our Constitution. There are laws such as those relating to rights of individuals in family property, night to succession, minority, guardianship, marriage and divorce which fall within the scope of the expression 'Civil Code'. Of all these, Marriage and Divorce are the most important. On this topic, there are both post constitution as well as preconstitutional laws such as. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Special Marriage Act, 1954 [Act Nos. 32 of 1963, 33 of 1969, 29 of 1970 and 68 of 1976]. The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. The Muslims Marriage and Divorce Act 1951 as applicable to different class of citizens have been made.

However, as regards the Personal Laws of Muslims, concerning marriage and divorce, no law has been enacted by the Parliament after the commencement of the Constitution. The Muslim Personal Law relating to marriage and divorce enables a man to take four wives at a time and further it confers a unilateral and absolute right on the husband to divorce his wife by his own order called 'talaq'. These provisions of Muslim Personal Law relating to Marriage and Divorce are discriminatory against women only on ground of s*x. It is also discriminatory only on the ground of religion. Equality as between man and woman and dignity of individual citizen is the very fundamental aspect of equality and social justice. The fundamental right guaranteed under Article 15 inter alia prohibits discrimination on the ground of s*x or religion. Further, the Uniform Law on the topic of Marriage and Divorce is essential for the purpose of national integration, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs. Shah Bano Begum— AIR 1985 SC 955 and in its recent judgment is Sarala Mudgal [1995 (3) SCC 635].

Despite the words of wisdom coming from the highest court and the Constitutional mandate, they are subordinated to religion dominated politics. Therefore, it is high time that supremacy of the Constitution must prevail. It is also matter of common knowledge that ordinarily no woman relishes the idea of her husband having another wife and Muslim women are no exception to this. But they are being discriminated against both on grounds of religion and s*x and males are favoured to the detriment of the interest of women and thereby causing gender discrimination.

Therefore, this Bill is intended to put an end to the discrimination against women on grounds of s*x, and religion by incorporating the rule of monogamy subject to the exceptions as expressly provided for in the Act. The provisions regarding divorce incorporated in this Act is, in terms of Section 27 and 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Monogamy as an invariable rule in exceptional cases causes great hardship both to the husband and wife, who are unwilling for divorce but second marriage has become necessary in the interest of both and the family. To illustrate, in a case where husband and wife love each other, and are leading a happly life, unfortunately on account of a motor accident, the wife loses both her legs, and therefore, unable to discharge her obligations as a wife, and therefore desires that her husband should take a second wife. But the existing law does not permit that and for that purpose has to seek a divorce of the first wife though they do not want it and which would result in inflicting greater injury than already suffered on account of accident or in a case where it is medically proved that the wife is not child bearing and therefore, the wife herself desires and gives consent to her husband taking a second wife, the law does not permit, which is unbearable to both.

Therefore, exception to monogamy is provided for, for all in order to avoid divorce, in cases in which either the wife or the husband or both do not want divorce even in cases in which a ground for divorce is made out. In such cases, provision has been made to the effect that with the consent of the wife only, according permission to the husband to take a second wife is provided for. This is intended to safeguard the interest of wife who does not like to be a divorcee, not only by maintaining her status as wife but also protecting all her rights under the law, as wife.

Further, in cases in which the wife is not child bearing or has become incapacitated for discharging her duties and obligations as a wife, she is given the right to seek permission of the Court for her husband taking a second wife with the object of continuity of the family. Provision has also been made for enabling a wife to take a second husband as provided in Section 11. In substance, this law is meant not only to ensure complete national integration which is essential for protecting and strengthening the feeling of fraternity among the people and unity and integrity of the National but also in protecting the interests of both husband, wife and their family.

Hence, this Bill.

M. RAMA JOIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM REGARDING DELEGATED LEGISLATION

Clause 18 of the Bill empowers the Central Government to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Bill. It will relate to matters of details only. The delegation of legislative power is of normal character.

RAJYA SABHA

 

-----------------------

A

BILL

to remove the discrimination between man and woman in the matter of marriage and divorce in the existing laws, to ensure equality between them and confer dignity and humane treatment to women and to strengthen family and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.

————

(Shri M. Rama Jois, M.P.)

-----------------------------------------------------------

‘The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010’ ---- This was the name announced by the cabinet spokes person ms. Ambika soni.

Following was the news of 11th june

Cabinet approves the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010 to amend the Hindu Marriage Act 

The Union Cabinet today approved the introduction of a Bill, namely, the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010 to further amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, to provide therein irretrievable break down of marriage as a ground of divorce.

IS THE ABOVE BILL IS THE SAID BILL?



Learning

 15 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     18 June 2010

Thank you Sir.


(Guest)

Marriage laws (amendment) bill, 2010 is quite different to the Marriage law bill, 2010.  The first one is approved by the cabinet and yet to be introduced in the parliament.  It seeks amendment in Hindu Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act.  The original draft is not available as it has not yet been introduced in parliament (even on internet frantic search is not bringing any fruitful result).  But as far as press release is concerned, it appears that amendments are being made in Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and para-materia section in Special Marriage Act.  

In the case of marriage law bill, 2010, it is a private member's bill. It was already introduced in Rajya Sabha as No. XXIII bill.  It does not have the support of neither Government nor any important oppositiion party.  Hence, indian Parliamentary history repeatedly tells us that  NO PRIVATE MEMBER'S BILL can be passed and the fate of this bill also will be the same and hence indepth study and analysis of this particular bill "in favour or against" is not required as it will not see the light of the day.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 June 2010

yes mr prabhakar, i wanted this confirmation.

because the name of the bill is diffrent and the contents also.

thank you for the clarification.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 June 2010

More information reg this bill -:

Sl no - 66

Bill no & year – XXIII of 2010.

Short title of the bill – The marriage law bill, 2010.

Introduced by govt./private – Private member

Member – Shri M Rama jois.

Ministry incharge – Law & Justice,

If assented act no – Nil.

Status – Pending.

1 Like

(Guest)

Thank you for clarification. Even I was also wondering how it happened so soon !
So we should hold our "for and against" guns till then :-)
Rgds.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 June 2010

"for and against" guns ?

.... ha................ha..........................ha.......


(Guest)

Sh. Arup ji,
Since 2002 Im without a wife and not much interaction with my own single child and Im today 45 yrs. grumpy young man so I will fire guns "for" right now BUT once my wife gets Irretriviable Breakdown of Marriage "Decree" I will fire guns  "against it" as what will be left for me by then for common conusmtption.......BTW, there are too many "sips" between "cup and lips" given to understand legislative wisdom of past "2 decades" on this topic ha ha
Don't take me seriously I enjoy this cancer called Marriage Laws in India ha ha
Rgds.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 June 2010

............ cancer called marriage laws........

it is right expression.


(Guest)

this bill is very unlikely to be passed

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     19 June 2010

ms kaur, this bill is not that bill. previously i were confused and posted it.

Narinder Verma (Director)     20 June 2010

Hi all,

I filed petition for divorce under desertion ground, as we are living apart from last 5 years. We got married on 11.02.2004 and got a baby girl on 24.11.2004. Since September' 04 she is living with her parents. Daughter is living with her too. She is in Govt. job which she took by misleading and producing wrong affidavits. She is having house on her own name. Her intention is to harass me. In court she showed her intention to continue the marriage but after court her wording is "neither I will live with you nor let you free". We both know we can't not live together but she is selfish and greedy. Out of court she is demanding 5,00,000 rupees from me. I don't have time and money to set a detective for her, but according to my own sources I came to know about her impurity (adulteration).

I don't know wht to do. In this age I don't have anything with me neither parents nor my kid. Isn't it my right to live free and happy? Can I get my kid. I want to enjoy my baby's childhood.

I don't think new amendment will effect my case. Any other suggestions please.

Thanks

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     20 June 2010

MR VERMA.

this bill is not that bill.

HOWEVER WHAT YOU POSTE, I BELIEVE TRUE. SEVERAL COMPLAINS ARE THERE BUT NO BODY IS THERE TO HEAR.

I DO NOT KNOW WHY OUR PERLIAMENT IS IN THE ROLE OF 'DHRITARASTRA'.

START SHOUTING MORE AND MORE TIME WILL COME WITH CHANGING SCENIAREO.

Suresh Ram (Business)     06 August 2010

The new bill introduced in Rajya sabha provides for "Irretrivable Breakdown of Marriage " a ground for seeking Divorce which is realy welcome move which would relive a woman from abusive reletionship.

At the same stroke the Bill has reduced a Hindu wife to that of a prostitute!!

Hindu Wife's only remedy agaist a husband seeking Divorce and who is willing to throw money on her face is only to clain "Financial Hardship".

The Court has only option of fixing the money that can remove her finacial hardship!!

The Advocate community has not bothered to condemn the gross demeaning of sisters and mothers!

A Muslim wife or a Christian wife stand in a differnet footing!!

Veerappa moily is all out to paint Hindu wives as Money seeking whores!!


(Guest)

@ Suresh Ram Sir


You are invited on board to a right post for discussion on core subject minus the general venom and now click  weblink https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/The-Marriage-Laws-Amendment-Bill-2010-22353.asp and discuss further the core points for and against the Bill, 2010 there please (gender neutrality or gender biasness this Bill is bringing is the main question).

Rgds. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query