Dr J C Vashista and G L N Prasad, sir first of all thanks for appreciation, this case has few unique features:
1. It was handled by an authorised representative.
2. Compensation was given to repurchaser of this case from original buyer's possession date on the basis of ' LAW OF TRANSFER', by Hon'ble Bench of NCDRC and didn't follow Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in several cases that compensation to repurchaser will be computed from his/her entry.
3. Repurchaser of this case was not offered a single penny as compensation by DLF Home with offer of possession in 2016 which was actually scheduled in 2012.
4. As per order, if compensation has not been offered by builder for delay possession then buyer can refuse to take possession and will be entitled to get compensation till fresh offer of possession as happened in this case.
Order was passed on 28.07.2021 by mistake it is written 28.08.2021..............still work in this case is left even after getting + Rs 40,00,000 as compensation through order:
i. Review application for justification of increased Super Area which increased rest amount to pay from Rs 6,00,000 to Rs.19,00,000
2. DLF should be directed to pay penalty in form of compensation in same rate 15% for first 3 months then 18% thereafter. My prayer give 6% to purchaser and rest amount would be taken in Consumer Welfare fund, in such way builders wouldn't delay projects in most of the cases.
Waiting eagerly another judgement in another case bigger than this since 10/3/2021 order reserved in CC/370/2013 for same complainant.............hope would help to bring light in many families after order in CC/370/2013...........once again thanks all learned members and management.