BCI DECISION IS FINAL ,NOT SIBALS,UNTIL AMMEND OF ADVOCATE ACT 1964
PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 12 September 2009
BCI DECISION IS FINAL ,NOT SIBALS,UNTIL AMMEND OF ADVOCATE ACT 1964
PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 12 September 2009
BCI DECISION IS FINAL ,NOT SIBALS,UNTIL AMMEND OF ADVOCATE ACT 1964
Mr.Sibal is a well known advocate. He has to think about reforms in LL.B / B.L courses and to thik about providing good infrastructure to the Law students, has to encorage research in Law etc. Already there is 5 years LL.B / B.L course. Students who have interest in Law they can study from * 2 level. I do not agree Mr.Sibal's proposal for BA (Law) as a part of legal education reforms.
Jaswant Singh (Lawyer) 21 September 2009
What Bar Council of India or State are doing? Affilating more and more private college without any proper verfication of the quality of education being impared by these institution. Our Councils are not interested to upgrade or regulate the law education in India. Even they are not bother whether the lawyer are delivering the quality legal help to litigants or not.
Anil Agrawal (Retired) 24 October 2009
First Arjun Singh and now Kapil Sibal. They want to create a niche for themselves as reformists. One has gone. Another will fall flat. Remember that education is a State subject.
N.K.Assumi (Advocate) 24 October 2009
Recently our Supreme Court pronounced that the lower Courts in the country is rottening, yes, there is a need to examined the prevailing legal education in the country. This is a very serious issues.
Anil Agrawal (Retired) 24 October 2009
Lower court is understatement.