LIVE Course on Transfer Property Law | Price Hike in 4 days | Grab it now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Adv Aneesh Trivedi 9424449500 (Advocate)     13 November 2013

Sc:dowry demand not enough for conviction

SC: Dowry demand not enough for conviction

13_11_2013 - Page - Deccan Chronicle, Hyderabad, India.

Merely making a demand for dowry is not enough to bring about a conviction in a dowry death case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday held saying that it must be proved that victim had been treated with cruelty or harassed for it.

“Merely making a demand for dowry is not enough. As held in Kans Raj case, a dowry death victim should also have been treated with cruelty or harassed for dowry either by her husband or a relative,” a bench of justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Madan B. Lokur said.

The bench also expressed concern over delay in disposing of the appeal filed by a man challenging his conviction in dowry death of his sisterin-law which took nine years. Referring to the
delay in dispoal of cases, the court quipped, “It is high time those of us who are judges of this court and decision makers also become policy makers“, without elabo rating.

The bench acquitted the man Bhola Nath in the case saying that family members cannot be made accused in dowry death case just because they stay together under one floor and there must sufficient evidence against each of them.

“While these persons may be staying together, it does not lead to any positive conclusion that each one of them was actively involved in demanding additional dowry from Janki Devi (victim) and also behaving in a cruel or humiliating manner towards her resulting in her consuming poison to end her life,” the bench said.

The court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict which had convicted Bhola Nath in the dowry death case.



Learning

 4 Replies

fighting back (exec)     13 November 2013

a very good comment by SC........commendable...thanks for posting this on the forum


(Guest)

A very good decision by Honorable SC. Thank you for posting this on the forum.

jack (boss)     14 November 2013

SUPER DECISION BY SC. BETTER SC ALSO TAKE SUE MOTTO CONSIRATION OF THE SUFFERERS BECAUSE OF MISUSE OF 498A AND OTHER SECTIONS BY GREEDY WOMEN.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading
Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads



Popular Discussion


view more »




Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query