Upgrad LLM

great observation on 139 ni act by madras hc

ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR

PLEASE GO THROUGH THE GREAT JUDGMENT ON NI ACT 139 



Attached File : 38738 211946 58 p gnanambigai vs s krishnasamy on 23 december 2010.pdf downloaded 355 times

Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 
advocate

Thanks Sir.

 
Reply   
 



In some of the judgements i observed that even after sufficient circumstantial evidence based on 139 presumption conviction was given, like the one you quoted. Great pain to convicted to approch higher courts for appel.

 
Reply   
 

sir,

in a  reccently  case  complaintant  state in court that  he give money against chaque and he paid by in him accout of saving account,  but he produce in court  a manager of bank and statement of current acoount with entry of the money.

when advocate of accused produce a application for statement of saving acount then trail court is refused.

WHAT ACTION WILL DO BY ACCUSED ADVOCATE?

PLEASE   ADVISE.

NATWAR RAJ PUROHIT

 
Reply   
 
ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR

file a petition under 311 Cr.p.c R/W 145 of ni act under in separate Cr.M.P to consider the Current A/c statement as Evidence of Defence in the interest of justice.

 
Reply   
 
POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE

Reddy sir what he says that complainant has produced entries in the current account for having given money while stated that money was given from savings account. I feel this is minor mistake.

The defense should not have allowed the depostion about current account since savings account is mentioned. Now it amounts to admission on the part of accused that money was given.

 
Reply   
 

sir jsdn,

bank statement entry in current accout with self. Not any name.  accused already stop payment with stolen cheque report on seven day earliar and find crtificate from bank.

 
Reply   
 
POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE

Persue the stolen cheque complaint than only it will be alibi otherwise not.

You should not have allowed the deposition about current account even if self cheque it amounts to admission on your part.

File revision for deletetion of this deposition than only hope otherwise in my opinion your defense has become weak.

Cheque bounce cases are most easy to win unless such types of mistakes are not done.

 
Reply   
 
POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE

Incidentally the Honble SC has given stringent directions for issue and tenure of NBW in criminal cases on 9th Sep 2011. Pl send your email ID to me at my email ID - firmaction at gmail for the copy of the original judgment which I will forward with pleasure.

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x