Can a court direct Petitioner not to appear in person? Isn't it violates Order III Rule 1 of CPC? In a case, wherein party in person has appeared in person for 8 years, in trials courts, High Courts, Supreme Court more than 200 times; a direction for not appearing in person is illegal, and made with intent of preventing facts to come on record.
What is the remedy? How can we challenge such order? Apologizing only reflects accepting faults. When the party is not at fault, it is a clear case of discrimination, suggest the remedy.
Can a court direct Petitioner not to appear in person? Isn't it violates Order III Rule 1 of CPC? In a case, wherein party in person has appeared in person for 8 years, in trials courts, High Courts, Supreme Court ore than 200 times; a direction for not appearing in person is illegal, and made with intent of preventing facts to come on record. What is the remedy? How can we challenge such order? Apologizing only reflects accepting faults. When the party is not at fault, it is a clear case of discrimination, suggest the remedy.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
Can a court direct Petitioner not to appear in person? Isn't it violates Order III Rule 1 of CPC? In a case, wherein party in person has appeared in person for 8 years, in trials courts, High Courts, Supreme Court ore than 200 times; a direction for not appearing in person is illegal, and made with intent of preventing facts to come on record. What is the remedy? How can we challenge such order? Apologizing only reflects accepting faults. When the party is not at fault, it is a clear case of discrimination, suggest the remedy.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
Can a court direct Petitioner not to appear in person? Isn't it violates Order III Rule 1 of CPC? In a case, wherein party in person has appeared in person for 8 years, in trials courts, High Courts, Supreme Court ore than 200 times; a direction for not appearing in person is illegal, and made with intent of preventing facts to come on record. What is the remedy? How can we challenge such order? Apologizing only reflects accepting faults. When the party is not at fault, it is a clear case of discrimination, suggest the remedy.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/plead-own-case-in-high-court-745816.asp
