Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

kvijay   23 August 2026

Opinions on a college dispute under indian anti-ragging law

I want opinions on a college dispute under Indian anti-ragging law. A student had paid admission fees and submitted the anti-ragging undertaking. In an unofficial WhatsApp group, another student first claimed to be 22, later 21, and only subsequently said he was actually 17. A major/adult student had a private WhatsApp interaction with him, including a drooling emoji. The 17-year-old then shared the private-chat screenshot in the entire group and complained that he was being bullied/harassed. Later, another unofficial WhatsApp group was created and the major student was excluded, resulting in his social isolation. A complaint is nevertheless being made against the major student. Questions: If someone repeatedly represented himself as 21/22, can he later rely on being 17 when making a ragging/harassment complaint against someone who reasonably believed he was an adult? Does his age misrepresentation affect the adult student's mens rea, knowledge and culpability? Can excluding the adult student from the new group itself potentially amount to social boycott/harassment/ragging? If the only private communication was a drooling emoji, does publicly circulating the screenshot change the legal analysis? Should the anti-ragging committee examine both students' conduct, rather than treating the 17-year-old automatically as the victim? I'm particularly interested in arguments against my position too — i.e., why the adult student could still be liable despite the age misrepresentation.

How can I prove that I was deliberately excluded from a WhatsApp group? I requested to join a WhatsApp group and have screenshots showing my join request. Later, the status changed to “Pending.” I made another request, but there is no clear indication in WhatsApp that an admin actually rejected me. The admins could potentially argue that I cancelled the request myself. What is the best way to establish what actually happened? Is a screen recording of the request/status useful? Can WhatsApp provide any record showing whether an admin rejected the request or I cancelled it? Would screenshots with timestamps, witnesses, or messages asking the admin to add me help? Is there any way to obtain metadata or WhatsApp records that distinguish “admin rejected” from “user cancelled”? If the matter reaches a college disciplinary/anti-ragging committee, what evidence would be considered credible to prove deliberate exclusion rather than merely failure to be admitted? I am specifically looking for practical WhatsApp evidence/forensic advice, not whether exclusion itself legally constitutes ragging.



Quick Summary
This discussion seeks opinions on a college dispute involving Indian anti-ragging law. It questions whether a student who misrepresented their age can later use their actual minor age to file a harassment complaint. The conversation also explores the impact of this misrepresentation on the other student's culpability, whether exclusion from a WhatsApp group constitutes ragging, and how to prove deliberate exclusion from online groups.

 5 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     25 August 2026

There is no legal; issue involved in this query which appears to be a hypothetical or an academic query, if you are really serious about it then you may consult a local advocate with your problems along with the documentary evidences and proceed as suggested 

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate )     26 August 2026

Contact, consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for proper analyses of facts, professional advise and necessary proceeding, if it is a true story.

kvijay   26 August 2026

with all due respect it did happen in real life

also my I dont anted to lead  opnion so put only facts

can I put this way "

If a person knowingly represented his age as 21/22 in a college WhatsApp group, while actually being 17, and later relied upon his minority after an interaction with another student, can the earlier age misrepresentation be considered relevant evidence of mala fide intention, lack of candour, or an attempt to create a misleading factual impression?

also plz chck dm

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     29 August 2026

Under general principles of evidence law (such as Sections 8 and 14 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 / Sections 6 and 11 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023), past statements and conduct that show motive, preparation, state of mind, or a pattern of deceit are admissible.

Therefore,the earlier age misrepresentation can be considered relevant evidence of mala fide intention, lack of candour, or an attempt to create a misleading factual impression—though its legal weight depends heavily on whether the context is civil/contractual, evidentiary, or disciplinary/criminal.

P. Venu (Advocate)     02 September 2026

The particulars furnished in WhatsApp group is hardly of any probative value. Age of person is best ascertained on the basis of official  documents.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register