Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ketan   21 January 2023

Omisson of confirming party in releasedeed

Last time i could not explain properly.
My mother me and my wife purchased flat jointley in 1993.since share of each is not mentioned deed while purchasing it is taken as 1/3 of each of us my mother died in 2008 .and recentley Release Deed was made where my brothers and sisters released there share in my favour. so this is deed between all legal heirs.my lawyer did not mention my wife as confirming party and says that since there is no dispute with your wife and she is willing to sign sale deed (Whenever we sell flat) or redevelopment deed (Whenever it happens ) .At present i am 2/3 owner (my1/3 +my mother's1/3 releaed in my favour ) and my wife is 1/3 owner.1/3 share of each of us by default.is this right? and if not what is the remedy?


Quick Summary
A query regarding a Release Deed where the user's wife was not included as a confirming party. The user and his mother jointly purchased a flat, and upon the mother's death, her share was released to the user. The user's siblings also released their shares to him. The core issue is whether the wife, who is a co-owner, should have been listed as a confirming party, and if the current 1/3 ownership split is correct by default.

 2 Replies

kavksatyanarayana (subregistrar/supdt.(retired))     21 January 2023

It is a repeated query and some days back it was replied.

Ketan   22 January 2023

No i did not mention that My brothers and sisters realeaeed in my favour .my question. is if my wife eho has no dispute is ready to sign sell deed or redevelipment deed my lawyer says it will suffice.ans 2 nd question is 1/3 share allof us by default is correct?Registrar has checked documents .

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register