prashant pundhir (Criminal Lawyer) 05 March 2011
Courts are filled with the fallse cases of 498A IPC, R/W 3/4 D.P act filed by the wives on the
entire family of the husband even old parents,married sisters and many times there
small children too .
Section 498A IPC comes it to the catogary of cognizable offence and non-bailable.So the named
persons produce thereselves before the court and pray for bail. Genrally courts
does not allow bail without sending jail .
The missuse of section 498A IPC is becoming more serious day by bay and women are using this
section in taking there revenge with husband and there family members . Now this section started
to break the families and which is again a serious problem .
Whole of the matter is in the view of Hon. supreme court and ministry of law . Both are thiking very seriously
to stop the missuse of this section and the only way is to make this section bailable and non-cognizable offence . But if this ammendment comes in to force,it will be a big loss for those wives who really suffer from mental and physical torcher for extra dowry demand .
But nothing could be done becouse 95% of the filed cases are false and only because to blackmail the
family of the husband.
Really it will be a great loss of the actually suffered lady. I have my sympathy with them ,but the Protection
of Family Violance act is there for protection .
Sreenivas V (S/W) 05 March 2011
"Both are thiking very seriously to stop the missuse of this section and the only way is to make this section bailable and non-cognizable offence . But if this ammendment comes in to force,it will be a big loss for those wives who really suffer from mental and physical torcher for extra dowry demand ."
As said above the above will not solve the real issue.
The solution should be make this case trial to be completed within 6 ot 12 months time frame and the guilty punished severly and fined huge amount also.
Second if it is found a false 498A case and misused this 498A just to extracxt money the wife also should be punished severly otherwise the same thing will be repeated. This is the main bad part which some women are misusing this 498A. But this will not happen as woman organizations wil not accept this and also our politicians will think about the vote bank always.
Kiritsinh (Lawyer) 05 March 2011
Advocats Friends Pls. Give me Suggestion..
My Matter is IPC 498A,323,504,506(1),114, DP Act 3,7
Matter : Police complain 2004 after Marrige 7 year- incident place (Territorial Jurisdiction ) A – case filling place B- police investigating on place B- police charge sheet submission in trial court place B- after objection applicant - trial court matter transferred (after Chif Court direction) on place A court ( original Incident Place) –A Place In Charge Frameed alredy - A Place trial Court Hon.Judge says Not Power chif court Matter transfer So I M transfer your matter Place A – Hows Possible all that’s ?
My Ques is : this trial court hows proceeding in this matter..? not proper police investigation and not proper court submission charge sheet..
shanthi kumari (private employee) 30 April 2011
yes sir,i am totally agree with you...by using 498(a) 3&4 section so many families are facing problem...and perticularly genuine persons are fails......now some of my friends also facing the problem in that...
Paras (Engr) 06 June 2011
Police doen't make proper insvestigation in 498a. If they start proper investigation. maximum no of cases will drop in police station.
danish (Manager) 11 June 2011
Why police will make proper investigation , they are the real b*st*rds to earn bribe they can go to any level they can even sell their sisters to ministers for promotions. Infact because of this NAMARD police there are so many false 498a cases. 498a birthplace is police station only. If b*tch wife is unable to prove
1. physical cruelty
so y 498a , basically police is aware about the family who is lying and who is not but they all are like male prostitutes pay them and they will do whatever u want them to do.
I fell ashamed that i m a indian, coz indians law are so biased.
we need to change this women oriented law .