swatikulkarni 10 August 2017
swatikulkarni 11 August 2017
In maintenance case (HMA 24 and 25) application for section 340 Cr.P.C. is rejected as fighres are same. Cort commented that since values are same, it is taken on the record. Court also suggested that husband should handle criminal matter separately and not to include in HMA 24 or 25.
So, husband filed separate case to Magistrate as per information technology act 43, 43a, 66, 66c, 66d, 72 and 72a and IPC 467, 468, 470, 471, 34.
Question: History shows in India, cyber crime is not investigated in a professional way. As of now success rate of cyber crime of very low. There are high chances of police can be manipulated and high chances that investigation may not happen proper to get easy escape by criminals involved. What can be done to ensure proper investigation should happen please?