Sir, thanks for your revert..........the judgements you have cited are as old as 2001 year. The company act law has gone through several revisions. Please clarify on this point, i may stand corrected if thats not the case. I have read cases where in cheque bounce cases under NI act the court helds the ROC records as proof/evidence of a Directors appointment /resignations
Note - what im asking is can any person who is still as on date shown as DIRECTOR of P Ltd co with ROC/its website stand in the court of law and claim, he no longer is a Director. I understand the company has to inform ROC by filing form DIR 12 and also the Director resigning has to file Form DIR 11 informing the ROC. The form 32 is an important ROC document that informs to the public about appointment/resignation /replacement of a Director.
Since matter in question has a financial implication as its a maintenance issue in divorce where the wife who is a Director of a profit making company is hiding her income/work employment to the court.....
Doesnt it become a matter of investigation / leading evidence to establish the truth OR will the court believe what the wife (who still appears as Director) says with an intention to harass the husband for sake of claiming huge alimony.
Is there any legal standpoint that i need to take to present my case firmly to court to establish wife is lying to the court (as its a fact that she is very much as Director as found after visiting her offices / and as claimed by herself on professional networking sites ).
Legal experts please help me understand and present the case to Family court.