An appeal wass filed in MPHC, jabalpur, against impugned decision of single bench of high court. The appeal wass heard even before serving me notice and ex parte stay was granted. On being served notice, I filed main reply ass weell as IA for vacating stay. Later I also filed IA for nonmaintainability and IA for perjury.
Recently, court listed hearing for IA for nonmontainability where it gave me just 2-3 minutes and decided to dispose the IA and said to list main case for final hearing. Later I found on the portal that all IAs were shown disposed.
Is it common to dispose IA without hearing in above situations. I think this is completely against principle of natural justice, first not to provide adequate time to the litigant to make submission, and then to dispose all IAs unilaterally.
This matter is related to an RTI case where information about statutory eligibility (based on which appointmentts have been made) have been asked that CPIO, FAA and CIC had rejected citing privacy clause. Later High court allowed my appeal and directed for disclosure.
I am non-advocate and petitioner in person.
The action of High court seems high handed and tolted towards those ewho have committed illegality of appointing likely ineligibile person.
Of course I am prepared for final hearing. But should not court have given me opportunity to hear on ex-parte stay before continuing it, or shuld not it have heard perjurt IA before disposing it? Guidance in this matater will be much apapreciated.
Regards.
Rajesh
