@ Jothish Kumar
Please be informed that NO JUDGE is bound by any ruling of any court.
The fact that the Apex Court's Judgements are usually drawn as a reference and adopted as a guide-line,is more due to the fact that the burden is less on the presiding judge since there already exists an earlier verdict in a similar case.
Case to Case, the difference is one too many.
So, essentially the focus has to be on LAW ( The Legal Aspect as codified ) and judgements in other matters are not to be held as mandatory to refer to and adopt.
Any advocate, good at his job, can circumvent paths created by the judiciary and drive the case on it's own unique path, without any reference drawn to any earlier judgement.
There are few advocates, very few, to be honest, with such capability.
But I have seen and met those rare few here, at Bangalore.
You just need to re-build your case in such a way that it revolves around the codified law and not on SIMILAR judgements.
That is not rocket science, but you need to have stamina coupled with the capability, in the court hall, to convince the judge that your case is worth giving some additional time since you have barely relied upon or totally not relied upon any earlier judgements but this case has travelled on it's own unique path and you are opening up that path in the court-hall for clarity on the unique aspects of your case.