A document dated 1947 has buyer name Lala Dharampal s/o Rai Sahab Lala Mohan Ram and the
signautre of buyer in full as "dharampal".
In 1966 when Dharampal sells his property to next person 'X' his name becomes only "Dharampal s/o Haveliram" and his signature remaining only as "dharama"
Now in a court case 'X' do not produce any legible documents in his favour and ultimately becomes Ex parte. It has also been intimated by the registrar office that the document of X dated 1966 are missing from their record.
Is the above observation made after personal enquiry is enough to held "x"'s documents fraud and on whom lies onus to prove the documents. Aslo there is no consistency between the boundaries of property shown in the
documents of 1947 and 1966.
