format for 341 CRPC ( Party In person)

195 of cr.p.c must be read with the sec 340 and 341 of Cr.P.C. in which the presiding officer has exclusive power to proceed or not.  So as per you query if you are a party in person file an appeal before the highcourt.  kindlyu approach  the concerned legal aid committe to help to come with this situation.

Unless your pleadings disclose offense proved in a court ,  no action possible. Just your presutions have no meaning.  Do not blame Judges or advocates.

Cr PC 340 will be attracted only when you have proved in the court that evidence is wrong so even if you know it is wrong will not help.

" 341 CRpc in family court matters "

- CRPC APPLICABLE FOR CRIMINAL OFFENCES & AT CRIMINAL COURT; NOT APPLICABLE TO FAMILY COURT MATTERS.

CPC AND FAMILY COURT RULES AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE AT FAMILY COURT.

"whatever I can fight party in person"

- ACCORDING TO CPC YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAR IN PERSON.

WHEN YOU PRESENT YOURSELF AT FAMILY COURT AND ON BEHALF OF YOU NO ADVOCATE IS PRESENT; YOU APPEAR IN PERSON. YOU JUST TELL THE MAGISTRATE THAT YOU ARE APPEARING IN PERSON. NORMALLY ORAL INFORMATION IS ENOUGH BUT FOR YOUR SATISFACTION - YOU MAY GIVE IT TO COURT IN WRITTING.

In your case,you have to submitt full evidences which can be easily traceble to court. you can't just approach the court on the grounds of papers it should have perfect authentication. Further when you are notifying the case as Cr p c you need to approach criminal court,which is the authority to decide.

Dear sir,
Sub:Request to not merge erstwhile Anakapalle Municipality into GVMC,VSP.-Reg.
Ref: 1)GOMS no:369,P.R.and Rural development(Pts.IV) Dept dt:30-7-2013. 2)GOMS no:373,M.A.and U.D.(ELEC.II)DEPTdt:30-7-2013.
 3)GOMS no:374,M.A.and U.D.(ELEC.II)DEPTdt:30-7-2013.
 4)GOMS no:375,M.A.and U.D.(ELEC.II)DEPTdt:30-7-2013
Kind attention is solicited to the reference first cited,Wherein Govt of Andhrapradesh has cancelled notifications issued(GOMS no:542,P.R.and Rural development(Pts.IV) Dept dt:3-12-2007.) Declaring (1)K.Nagarapalem,(2)Kaplulu.

Uppada, and three other villages of Bheemunipatanam(M),(6)Thadi,(7)Salapuvanipalem of Paravada Mandal,(8)Rajupalem,(9)Valluri,(10)Koppaka of Anakapalle(M) as Gram Panchayats, so as to include them into GVMC. But in the light of recent Honorable High court(AP) orders, the combined GO in the ref 4th cited above need to be cancelled Honoring the court orders,to proceed further.Then the GO in the first ref cited also to be cancelled since it is also a combined GO pertaining to both the Rural areas covered before entering in two muncipalities proposed for merger into GVMC limits. Hence the GOs in the 1st,2nd,3rd references needs to be cancelled as GVMC limits cant be extended by jumping directly to those two municipalities ignoring all the ten Villages where Public opinion was not taken up before merging the Proposed areas,as i have already submitted my requests earlier. The above matter requires an urgent and appropriate action in time.

 

I am working in GOI, want to file a WP in chennai High Court party in person. As I am working in GOI, I cannot go to High Court Legal Services. Please guide me, how to proceed?