LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raman ( )     16 July 2009

File PIL against Gammon India Limited !

Deal All,

 

I recently learnt about the Delhi bridge collapse (2009) and was surprised to see that whoever constructed this bridge, had also constructed a flyover in Hyderabad (2007) which was another failure of the construction company 'Gammon India Limited'. 



In order to cease poor constructions that are posing a threat to general public and also involving huge government funds, can anyone be able to file a PIL against MCH/State including the private party who constructed these flyovers ? Can someone educate me on this ? How practical is this? Can the injured party get the compensation from these damages? Which field of law is applicable here ?



 1 Replies

Guest (Guest)     16 July 2009

 The crack in Pier 67 near Lady Shriram College in south Delhi was not responsible for the collapse of the elevated Delhi Metro line 

 
last Sunday, DMRC managing director E Sreedharan told TOI on Wednesday, raising questions about what then really led to the accident - faulty design, inefficient execution or sub-standard material used? 



In an exclusive interview, Sreedharan said the hairline crack was noticed by DMRC officials in March, months before the structure came crashing down. ``We still don't know what exactly happened on Sunday. It is true that we saw the crack. We put a thin glass on it. That is the monitoring process - if the crack expands, the glass breaks. But the glass is still there. So, the accident was not due the crack. The failure is somewhere else.'' 



So what caused the collapse? ``I am still waiting to see what really went wrong. Being an experienced engineer, my own hunch is that there is a design deficiency on that particular pier. There could be a problem with the material, or reinforcement on site which led to the mishap,'' he added. 



DMRC, he said, was in no mood for mercy ? if there has been negligence, it will be dealt with severely. 



``The matter is being probed by a four-member committee. A separate audit has been ordered to check all the other such installations in Phase II to check the designs and drawings, material used in construction and the reinforcement done on site.'' 



Sreedharan said he had to own responsibility for the mishap and that's why put in his papers. He said that he knew about the crack, and had in fact climbed up the pier himself to check it out. His gut feel was that the pier should be demolished, he said. But his officers said they would test it out with twice the load before commissioning the line. He agreed. 



``But it collapsed under the weight of the launcher. I am a technical man and should have known better. How can I not own up responsibility? But I received support and confidence from the chief minister, the L-G and minister Jaipal Reddy. Even Rahul Gandhi rang up and asked me not to quit. Now I will stay till the end of Phase II, come what may. It is my commitment to the nation.'' 



And after that? ``After the completion of Phase II, my intention is to retire both from professional and public life. I will not be available to preside over a conference or to give lectures. I want to devote my time to spirituality now for which I plan to go back to my village near Palghat in Kerala. I have no domestic worries,'' he said. 



He is already grooming a successor to take over charge of Phase III, Sreedharan said. ``There are 3-4 people. But they will not flower till I am here. It's something like a banyan tree ? unless you cut it, the other trees can't grow.''


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register