Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

kamal kumar sharma (LL.B)     12 January 2020

diffrence

what is the difference between arbitration act 1940 and 1996?


Quick Summary
The Arbitration Act of 1940 was based on the English Arbitration Act of 1934, whereas the current Arbitration Act of 1996 is modelled on the UNCITRAL framework. The 1996 Act replaced the 1940 Act and introduced significant changes, including amendments to the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) of 1908. Section 89 of the CPC now allows parties to settle disputes outside of court with mutual consent.

 2 Replies

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     14 January 2020

What is your concern / problem if it is not an academic question ??

However, if there is some truth in the story it is advisable to consult a local prudent lawyer for better appreciation of facts / documents, professional guidance and necessary proceeding

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     18 January 2020

The basic difference between the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Arbitration Act of 1996 is that the Arbitration Act of 1940 was based upon the English Arbitration Act of 1934 which prevailed in the British.

The Arbitration Act of 1940 has been replaced by the Arbitration Act of 1996. The Arbitration Act of 1996 is based upon the UNCITRAL. Because of the new enactment with reference to Arbitration Law in India, Civil Procedure Code (CPC) of 1908 has been amended and S. 89 was introduced in it. According to S. 89(1) of CPC there is an option available for the parties to settle the disputes outside the courts. It can be done only with the consent of the parties to the dispute.

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register