Deniability

This discussion delves into whether a petitioner can retract statements made in their original petition, particularly if those statements are used against them in a separate legal case. It questions if a 'mistake of fact' or lack of information at the time of filing can be a valid reason for denial. The consensus suggests that while simple plaint statements drafted by advocates might be challengeable, facts admitted during cross-examination and decided by a judgment in a previous case hold more weight and are harder to deny.