Why speedy trial & perjury ?

Rocky Smith, I really apperciate your comments. Thanks & Regards.

Thanks Mr. N.K.Assumi

Dear Friends, 

First of all file a strong WS in 125 CrPC and show that our income is very less as a bagger. (Less than 4000/- per month or Jobless).

If you are privately employed in a private firm or self employed (Business) than she can't prove your actual income details since private firm never disclose your pay slip to anybody and in case of self employed there is not such pay slip. If they or magistrate ask you to produce pay slip or income proof then simply tell them that you don’t have it or company does not issue any pay slip. (Barden to prove her allegations and claims lies on her.). This approach is will reduce your maintenance very less.

The best approach is

a) Change your job and don’t disclose it anybody.

b) Show jobless in the court.

c) Change your current address also so that they cannot serve you any more copy (Like maintenance execution).

Usually interim maintenance = (your stated income per month in WS – You and Your dependents total expense in fooding, lodging, home loan EMI, LIC investments, medical expense any other miscellaneous expense ) * 1/5th.

So please be careful to show the amount per month in WS. Your lawyer will always mislead you and make you afraid and pressurize you to show the actual income yet you should be bold enough to take thiese steps. The court will not kill you for this little false submission. 

The same approach is advisable for other cases also like DVA, Sec. 24 HMA & Sec. 36 of SMA (Maintenance pendent lite).

Please read each of my posts carefully in the following links for sample petitions and other necessary clues.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Fight-against-misuse-of-498a-ipc--103100.asp#.U6gslUCm9dg

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Best-way-to-fight-against-false-498a-103111.asp#.U6gsRkCm9dg

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=104564&offset=1

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Why-speedy-trial-amp-perjury--124819.asp#.VbzWibOqqkp

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Why-speedy-trial-and-perjury--124820.asp#.VbzWx7Oqqko

I agree with the following comments : -

"If one wants to see the most notorious criminals, one must look for them only in judges"

I would like to add politicians also in this category since, for hiding their own mistakes they have created biased laws. 

However, I disagree the following comments : - 

Originally posted by : TGK REDDI
	Now to the topic. You wrote about perjury petitions against false petitions.    Perjury petition (never complaint) cannot be filed against false petitions.     A complaint can be filed by anyone if a petition is false.     It is forgery, not perjury.     If a petition already in the custody of a court is altered, Court only can be the complainant.    This too is not perjury but forgery.     If a deponent or witness lies, this's perjury and again court only can be the complainant.    A party can file a petition only but not complaint.     They can move a higher court if the petition is winked at.

Dear Friend,

I have notice from the above post again one big confusion on Forgery and Perjury.

Let me again try to enlighten it.

Difference between Perjury and Forgery.

Perjury: -

Please see - 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1115/07.

(Para 7 & 8)

7. Whenever an application under Section 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure is filed, the Civil Manual Chapter XIX para 337 requires that it should be registered as Miscellaneous Judicial Case i.e. a case where a Judicial Enquiry is contemplated. The learned Civil Judge should have, therefore, directed the application to be registered as Miscellaneous Judicial Case. Section 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure reads thus –

340. Procedure in cases mentioned in Section 195

(1) When upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interest of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary, –

(a) record a finding to that effect ;

(b) make a complaint thereof in writing;

(c) send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction;

(d) take sufficient security for the appearance for the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to do send the accused in custody to such Magistrate ; and

(e) bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate.

(2) The power conferred on a Court by subsection

(1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of Section 195.

(3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed,-

(a) Where the Court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the Court may appoint;

(b) in any other case, by the presiding officer of the Court or by such officer of the Court as the Court may authroise in writing in this behalf.

(4) In this section, .Court. has the same meaning as in Section 195.

8. The section thus says that the court should be of opinion that an enquiry should be held. Even for forming an opinion, there should be some evidence and not mere surmises. If there is a prima facie evidence, the court must enter into an enquiry and record a

finding as to whether an offence referred to in Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure is committed. It was, therefore, not proper on part of Judges of the lower courts to have rejected the application.

Conclusions: -

1. So whenever an application is made u/s 340 CrPC read with 195 CrPC based on contradictory points (prima facie evidence of para 8 of the aforesaid judgment) the court must enter into an enquiry registering the case as per Civil Manual Chapter XIX para 337 as a Miscellaneous Judicial Case.

1. If it is found in that enquiry that the offences are punishable as per IPCs mentioned in CrPC 195, the court must take cognizance accordingly.

Forgery: -

464 IPC, Making a false document. — 341 [A person is said to make a false document or false electronic record— First —Who dishonestly or fradulently—

(a) makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document;

(b) makes or transmits any electronic record or part of any electronic record;

(c) affixes any 342 [electronic signature] on any electronic record;

(d) makes any mark denoting the execution of a document or the authenticity of the 342 [electronic signature],

Conclusions: -

1. When the document itself is fraud, for example, if the petition is notarized from a fraud notarized authority.

1. When signature , seals are fraud  

1. Fraud electronic records, for example a superimposed picture is a fraud document.

1. Forgery can be filed against this type of fraud documents (Not against any contradictory points as prima facie evidence of para 8 of aforesaid judgment).

Perjury is a procedure for enquiry of both false evidences and fraud documents whereas forgery is definition of fraud documents and punishment.

So clearly perjury and forgery is not same. Perjury can be file at any stage of a civil or criminal case.

Please let me know in case you have any more confusion on this.

Ground of Speedy Trial. - 

Ground of Speedy Trial to dispose of 498A and Matrimonial Suits within 6 months. -

a) Personal liberty cannot be deprived as per Article 21 of Indian Constitution for slithering trial.

Some more queries on this: -

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=126752&offset=1#.Ve7dwdKeDGc 

Why we should not compromise/MCD with 498A?

a)    MCD by paying money encourages the wrong business of corrupted Judges, Advocates and wrong women.

b)    498A is non-compoundable hence can't be withdrawn once filed.

c)    Even if you try to compromise by paying money then also these corrupted peoplebreaches any agreement/deed of MCD in arecurring way by taking half of the settlement money to get more money. In consequence, you become bankrupt. 

Please don't go for any MCD by paying money. Your advocates and judges will always seduce you on this. Please don’t listen to them.

ALL GENDER BIASED FEMINIST LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 

Please see my blog on this below : - 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=133540&offset=1#.VsxeQ9IrLIU

WHY PERJURY IS ESSENTIAL?

Dear Friends,

As you all may know that “Burden of proof” lies on prosecution in any criminal case since the basic concept of jurisprudence is “presumption of innocent” in criminal trial of accused party.

Please read Section 102 of Indian Evidence Act carefully. If prosecution is unable to adduce evidence to prove guilt of accused parties then accused will be automatically acquitted.

However, my suggestion is, the ultimate target of all accused should be – “to Prove the plaintiff as false” – to get ultimate relief.

If accused can prove the plaintiff as false then –

a) Charge will be framed on complaint in the same court u/s 211, 182, 193 IPCs

b) Accused party can prosecute complainant on defamation (IPC 499 read with 500 IPC), win it easily.

c) Accused can sue against the STATE for damages and claim compensation amount.

d) Even the accuse can prosecute the IO (Investigation Officer) for false charge sheet.

Now, to prove – “plaintiff as false” accused parity must adduce leading evidence since here “burden of proof” lies on accused party. Please check Section 103 of Indian Evidence Act – Burden of proof as to particular fact. – Here the said “particular fact” – is to prove that the “plaintiff as false”.

That is the reason Perjury (CrPC 340 read with 195 CrPC) petition is essential tool for further investigation/further inquiry along with leading evidences of accused. Please also know that adduce leading evidence is a must for accused party to prove – “plaintiff as false”.

Hi @RockySmith,

                  I gone through ur post regarding Purjury. It is encouraging one. I accordingly filed One Purjury application in my D.V. Case where deposition of Complainant was over. My query is in ur post there r several citations are provided regarding "Purjury should be decided first". Out of them except Allahabad HC judgement no judgements were form a clear view that Pujury should decide first in any circumstances.

              Can u have come to across any judgement except Allahabad HC judgement? Plz share. Thanks.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Interim-order-of-maintenance-u-s-125-crpc-unconstitutional--158134.asp

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Interim-order-of-maintenance-u-s-125-crpc-unconstitutional--158134.asp

awesome rocky..