1 . Yes , this matter is now end and trial court convicted the accused (govt.employee )under prevention of curruption act.
2. The demand for money was granting agriculture subsidy money.which was already done by high Authority as par rules & regulation.
My queary is that when complaintat subsidy was granted and subsidy amount transferred in complaintat bank account . Then after he lodje FIR saying that accused demanded bribe money
ACB arranged trap and at the place third party (public person) caught to receive money on behalf of accused. Where accused was not present.
If complaintat don't give bribe money what was the problem with him where his subsidy was granted and deposited? It means that complaintat intention was to trap accused any way in bribe case.