LIVE Online Course on NDPS by Riva Pocha and Adv. Taraq Sayed. Starting from 24th May. Register Now!!
LAW Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

khushi sharma   13 May 2020

case law

details about the case way Reema Agarwal V. Anupam(2004)
under section 304B


 1 Replies

Archit Uniyal   13 May 2020



Supreme Court in Reema Agarwala Vs. Anupam & Ors., 2004 laid down that the validity of a marriage will not act as a bar for a woman to institute a case u/s.498(A) I.P.C.

The court said that the absence of a definition of 'husband' to specifically include such persons who contract marriages ostensibly and cohabitate with such woman, in the purported exercise of his role and status as 'husband' is no ground to exclude them from the purview of Section 304B or 498A IPC, viewed in the context of the very object and aim of the legislation introducing those provisions.

You may read these article and the comments for a better understanding of Legal Perspective of the live-in relationship in India:




Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads

Popular Discussion

view more »

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query