Madhusudan G R (Advocate) 15 February 2023
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 16 February 2023
File the CD / Pen Drive of the recording and its transcripttion in the language of the Court alongwith a certificate u/s 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Madhusudan G R (Advocate) 16 February 2023
Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 ) 16 February 2023
S. Pratap Singh v. the State of Punjab (1964)
In this case, the Supreme Court accepted a telephonic recording of a conversation between two parties after examining the evidentiary value of tape-recorded conversations.
Member Strength 9,48,161 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
