appointment under SRO 43

3- Appointment under these rules��(1) ** [xx] Notwithstanding anything contained in any rule or order for the time being in force regulating the procedure for recruitment in any service or post under the Government, an eligible family member of a person specified in rule 2 may be appointed against a vacancy in the lowest rank of non-gazetted service or Class-IV post having qualification as prescribed under the relevant Recruitment Rules. Provided that the applicant is el

SO there is nothing illegal happend against you

 

You r basic query is to find propspects of filing case for promotion.

 

You have no case in this regard and if having extra money to feed lawyers then you can go ahead.

 

As far as promotion is concerned you can seek promotion from the present post based on vacancy, seniority and your qualifying serivce and reservation status of the vacancies.

 

As far as you qualifiction is concerned nothing stops you to keep applying in other state/central deptts.

How comes, he was not involved in any wrongful deeds at that time. Then how the penalty will be slapped on him from then? Punishment cannot be given with retrospective effect, more particularly from that period when he has not done any punishable offence. Thus, due to the misconstruction of forfeiture clause, bank officers`pension are being snatched away every day. Pension Fund is a contributory fund. That bank officer has accumulated his due contribution for so many years. In one stroke it cannot be declared wholly as NIL.

 

YES THIS CAN BE DONE.

This is a sheer injustice.

In that case, also, the state does not snatch away the accumulated deposits of a murderer. But dismissed bank officers are being deprived regularly in that way.

 

NO NO.  IN CASE OF MURDER EVEN ACCUMMULATED LIFE CAN BE TAKEN AWAY BY THE STATE.

Sudhirji,

Aapke Aakhiri 3 ullekh kisi aur prashan ke sambandh me lagte hain.

sahi prashankarta ke duara shuru kiye nibandh me likh devain taki jaruratmand apki salah se vanchit na rah jave.