LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

SANKARPRASAD (MNGR)     24 April 2024

Rights of person to transfer immovable and movable property.

A person Hindu  Brahmin married belongs to Andhra Pradesh became alcoholic addicted.  He was unable to control at home and joined in DeAddiction centre at Bangalore.

After this His ligitimate daughter missed from home for some time after her intercaste marriage issue. At this point he came from Bangalore ( brought actually) adopted his sister's son through Adoption registered deed. 

After this his daughter brought him from Bangalore kept at her home in Andhra Pradesh for some time then did some property registrations through him( Property belongs to him only) and got huge benifits . After completion of these transactions he moved again to Bangalore DeAddiction centre.

Finally he demised at Bangalore DeAddiction centre  in 2014. His total on and off tenure at Bangalore DeAddiction centre may be more than 25 years.

Daughter's argument is During the time of stay at her home he is perfect and did property registrations on his own wish. She  moved him again to Bangalore DeAddiction centre as per desire.

They never arranged any Doctors treatment to him when ever he was in daughter's home.

Now the people purchased properties from him are facing legal issues from his Adopted Son.

what is the validity of property registrations he did during the stay at Daughter's home.

Warm Regards



Learning

 5 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     24 April 2024

There's no illegality in he selling the property by executing the registered sale deed in the presence of sub registrar when he was of good mental health.

Therefore any challenge to the sale deed may not be maintainable.

Shashi Dhara   24 April 2024

Adopted son has no right to question the sale of his adoptive father, he only gets right in ancsetral property of his share only, adoptive father alone cannot adopt without consent of wife when he has daughter. Adoption becomes invalid.

Hridaya Sharma   24 April 2024

The property would have been passed down based on the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, the Special Marriage Act of 1954 or the Guardian and Ward Act of 1890. 

If the daughter can establish that the property transfer was done when her father was in a state of sound mind or had the right mind state to be able to make a decision of property transfer then any other objection to it cannot be maintainable.

The adopted son cannot create any legal issues unless his share of the property has been tampered with. 

There should be no issues for the purchasers of the property if it is established that the property has been legally obtained by his daughter and the adopted son has got his share of the same. Selling the property which is owned by the daughter will not create any legal issues since the property belongs to the daughter and doing anything with it is her personal choice.

 

1 Like

P. Venu (Advocate)     24 April 2024

Admittedly, the property has been transferred to the daughter through a duly registered deed. the transaction is valid unless proved otherwise. The onus of proving the transaction to be invalid vests with the person who makes such an averment. It could also be that the challenge is beyond the period of limitation.

1 Like

Aadil (Student)     24 May 2024

Dear Sankar Prasad,

Thank you for your query! I am Aadil and I will try to answer your question.

 

The short answer to your query is YES. The property registrations done are completely valid.

But this is dependent on the fact that at the time of registration, the deceased was of sound mind. This fact has to be proven in court to ensure that the registrations stay valid. 

Assuming that the property was given to the daughter, the adopted son cannot create any legal issues if his share of the property is still intact. If that is not the case and the adopted son is not left with any property, he has every right to claim maintenance from this daughter. 

An adopted child has the same rights as the biological child, as per section 12 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Also in the same act, Section 21 classifies the son, both biological and adopted, to be a ‘dependant’ and can thus under Section 22 of the same act claim maintenance from whoever takes the estate, provided they have not obtained any  testamentary or intestate succession.

I hope this helps. Thank you for your time and patience!

 

Regards,

Aadil


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register