others

Name of the Case Jitendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh Key Takeaways The Additional Commissioner of Rewa had passed order on the basis of a will produced by the petitioner which was set aside by the MP High Court. li style="tex..

KEY TAKEAWAYS This case was heard by the bench of Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Justice Piyush Agrawal According to the facts of the case, the court applied the principle of prima facie in this case. The petitioner abused the process..

Magistrates Cannot Extend Time To Complete Investigation In UAPA Cases The case was of Sadique v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The decision was given by Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Belam M Trivedi. Sr. Advocate Siddhartha Dave appeared for the appellants whereas AOR Pashupathi Nath Razdan appeared for the resp..

KEY TAKEAWAYS To obtain a legal heir certificate, a person needs to apply in the respective area’s tehsildar’s office or corporation/municipality office or district civil court. The spouse, children, parents of the deceased can apply for the legal heir certificate./..

KEY TAKEAWAYS The Hon’ble High Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India are given the rights to investigate and punish for contempt of court by the Constitution as well as the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. The state and the UPSC are bound to follow the directions ..

CASE NAME AND CORAM Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area Of M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Appellant(S) Versus Workmen Being Represented By Janta Mazdoor Sangh Citation: LL 2021 SC 424 Coram: Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul an..

Name of the Case Karthik Ranganathan v. Disciplinary Committee-IV, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry and Ors. Key Takeaways A petitioner approached the Supreme Court by way of writ Petition against the decision of State Bar Council ..

CASE TITLE Dr. Harish Kumar Khurana vs. Joginder Singh KEY TAKEAWAYS This case was heard by the bench of Hon'ble Justice Surya Kant, A.S. Bopanna. There shall be solid evidence to prove medical n..

CASE NAME AND CORAM CASE NAME: Vedanta Limited V. Director of Mines and Geology; Geetabala M. N. Parulekar V. Director of Mines And Geology CORAM: Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna h2 style="..

Railways Liable To Pay Compensation For Late Arrival Of Trains If Delay Is Not Justifiable The Supreme Court has held that the railways are liable to pay compensation unless they provide evidence and explain the late arrival of a train to establish and prove that delay occurred because of the reasons beyond their control. The..

Key Takeaways Sale is defined under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. A sale deed is a legal document that proves that the seller has given the purchaser absolute ownership of a property. A conveyance deed is a legal docume..

KEY TAKEAWAYS The India Trusts Act, 1882 is the law followed for private trusts in India. A trust allows the trustee to hold assets on behalf of the beneficiary. The parties in a trusteeship are; Author of trust/trustor (one who creates the trust); the trustee (one who holds the..

Background This particular case involved two suits that were disposed of together. The names of the cases are "T.V. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. M. Mallappa" and "Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji Vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan". Plaint..

CASE The State of Manipur v. J Hillson Angam and Anr KEY TAKEAWAYS This matter in the High Court was heard by the bench of Justices Lanusungkum Jamir And Kh. Nobin Singh. This matter in the Supreme C..

KEY TAKEAWAYS Case name is: Munnawar Rana Vs State of U.P. under the guidance of Justice Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha and Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav. The learned attorney argued that some of the applicant's allegations about certain personal interactions with family and friend..