25% OFF on all LCI Courses. Offer valid till 5th Oct. Use Code: DUS25
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


  • This particular case involved two suits that were disposed of together.
  • The names of the cases are "T.V. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. M. Mallappa" and "Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji Vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan".
  • Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the Trial Court seeking a perpetual injunction against the defendants. It prohibited them or anyone acting on their behalf from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.
  • A decree was granted, and the defendants appealed in the Karnataka High Court.
  • The Karnataka High Court overturned the decree after the defendants filed an appeal, stating that the suit simpliciter for a permanent injunction without seeking a declaration of title was not tenable.
  • The case was hence, before the Supreme Court of India.

Issue Raised

Whether the plaintiff's suit simpliciter for a permanent injunction without claiming declaration of title was maintainable in this case?

Court's Observation

  • The Court noted that in "Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy (2008)," it was held that where the plaintiff's title is not in dispute or clouded, a suit for injunction can be decided on the findings regarding the possession.
  • Based on the evidence on file, the Court stated that the plaintiff does not have a clear title to the suit property.
  • According to the bench, the question at hand required adjudication after the evidence has been presented and all questions of fact and law have been resolved.
  • The Court also cited the decision in Jharkhand State Housing Board v. Didar Singh (2019) 17 SCC 692, which held that a suit for bare injunction is not maintainable when the defendant casts a cloud over the plaintiff's title.


  • The Appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice B.R. Gavai.
  • The Court stated that a suit simpliciter for a permanent injunction without claiming declaration of title could only be maintained if the plaintiff's title is not under dispute.
  • It was observed that while deciding the issue in a suit for mere injunction, the Court must relegate the parties to a comprehensive suit for declaration of title if the matter involves complicated questions of fact and the law relating to the title.
  • Similar observations were made by the same bench in dismissing an appeal (Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji Vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan) filed against a Kerala High Court judgment that raised the same legal issues.


  • What do Perpetual Injunctions in a civil suit mean?
  • What is the meaning of Declaration of title?

Do share your views in the comments section.

"Loved reading this piece by Megha Bindal?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"

Tags :

  Views  141  Report

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query