others

KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court in a recent case said that an employee who made false or suppressed evidence in a criminal case will not be entitled to continue in service as a matter of right. This judgement set aside the verdict of Rajasthan High Court which quashed the order ..

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: Alkesh and others Vs. State of M.P. Case Citation: Criminal Appeal No.8182/2019 Coram:Justice Subodh Abhyankar KEY TAKEAWAYS li style="te..

Facts of the case The current case was directed against an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in 2006. The plaintiff in the case was inducted as a tenantby the Rent Controller under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. The building was brought by ..

Is Taking A Voice Sample From Accused W/O Consent Unconstitutional? The case was of Ritesh v. State of Uttar Pradesh. The decision was given by Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati. The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the plea of the accused in which he contended that his voice sample cannot be taken against his wishes, as it would ..

Key Takeaways A person’s property is important for the owner and it is common that one would like to protect their property. The transfer of property happens in various ways and the registration is done to ensure that the property is safe. li style="text-align: jus..

Key Takeaways The Case titled Neha @ Pooja Alizad vs. Vaibhav Kumar @ Chetan Sancheti ((Civil) No(s). 183/2019) was filed before the Supreme Court. The parties sought a Mutual Consent Divorce Decree after agreeing on the terms of mediation. li style="text-align: justify;..

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh v. Union of India Case Number: Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1018/2021 Coram: Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice L Nageswara Rao/l..

Case title K.N. Rajakumar Vs. V. Nagarajan Key Takeaways This case was heard by the Bench of Justice L Nageswara Rao, Justice BR Gavai and Justice BV Nagarathna The CIRP proceedings can be withdrawn ..

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: Vijaykumar Bhima Dighe v. Union of India and others CORAM: Justices Sunil Shukre and Anil Kilor KEY TAKEAWAYS Rules allowing each state's selectio..

KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court has held that failure to discharge burden under section 106 of the Evidence Act may provide a link to the chain of events but is not applicable to a case concerning circumstantial evidence where the prosecution can't establish a chain of circumstances. li style="text-align: ..

Background of the Case An FIR was registered by Paramjit Singh Akali, a member of Sikh Youth Power of Punjab, against singer Gurudas Maan. The petitioner (Gurudas Maan), while performing the Urs of Sai Murad Shah Ji at the premises of Dera Baba Murad Shah Ji Trust made certain c..

Key Takeaways An appeal before the Supreme Court was filed in Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited vs. M/s Ajay Sales & Suppliers. The issue raised in the appeal was whether the Chairman could be considered 'ineligible' under Section 12 (5) read with the A..

Name of the Case Anjali Rathi v. Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Key Takeaways The petitioners had approached the Court seeking refund of the money with interest given to the respondents. ..

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: Shifa Hasan and Another Vs State of U.P. and Others Case Citation: WRIT - C No. - 16336 of 2021 Coram: Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta &Hon'ble Deepak Verma h2 style="text-align: j..

Case title M/S SYLVANUS PROPERTIES LTD. v. PARESH PRATAP RAI MEHTA Key Takeaways This case was heard by the Bench of Justice Amit Bansal. The learned counsel of the petitioner was Advocate Pravin Bah..