In this judgement, CPC does not apply to HRC orders ..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal & set aside the judgement of HC given in second appeal. ..
..
..
The Court held the Plaintiff to pay the Court fee by invoking Rule 10 & 11 from Order 33 of C.P.C. The court didn’t direct the defendant to pay the Court fee...
The High Court ultimately held that such an application for eviction was maintainable. Hence the appeal to this Court Allowing the appeal and remitting the case back to the Rent Controller. ..
Petition dismissed due to lack of evidence by petitioner...
Before declaring the Judgment the Court very well explained the provisions of Order 37, even with reference to Order 9. The Supreme Court held that, though appellant has shown sufficient cause for his absence on the date of passing ex parte decree, s..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal & upheld the decision of the HC. It held that a suit against a public officer of Government until and unless the statutory period of 2 months has expired after delivering the notice under Section 80 of CPC, 1908..
The High Court allowed the appeal & set aside the decree of the Trial Court. It observed that by virtue of the office, the Executive Engineer has the right to file a plaint to protect the interests of the Government as provided under Order 27 Rule 2 ..
..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the right of the board to appeal in High Court as the right to appeal was available to the respondent at the time of initiation of the dispute before the amendment which wasn’t preserved thereof. ..
In SC's opinion the plaintiff was entitled to file an application/appeal under Order 44 Rule 1 of the Code and seek permission from the Appellate Court to allow him to file an appeal as an indigent person. The dismissal of the application made under ..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the appellants are neither the aggrieved party nor bound by the judgement of Trial court or HC ..
The Supreme Court decreed the appeal filed by the Appellant and condoned his delay of 546 days in filing the First appeal. ..
The Honorable Supreme Court pointed out the mistake made by the Trial Court and the High Court and gave a judgment setting aside the decree passed by the High Court...
After referring to all the evidences of adultery and cruelty, the husband was declared guilty of adultery and cruelty. The cruelty which entitles her to a judicial separation, even if he was not guilty of adultery. The manner in which the husband had..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal & withheld the decision of HC in not granting divorce. The court observed that the constant nagging & inappropriate behavior of the wife has certainly caused mental agony to the husband which amounts to cruelty. ..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. It was observed by the court that the reason for the wife living separately from her husband is justified based on the wrongs done by the husband. Also, the wife is ready to live with him on a reasonable condit..
The appeal was allowed and the judgment was set aside as the High Court was wrong in it's decision. ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
