The appeal was allowed and the impugned judgement was set aside. It said that since the mandate of Shri Khan having terminated, as he has become de jure unable to perform his function as an arbitrator, the High Court may appoint a substitute arbitrat..
The order decreed that the petitioner failed to make any interference with an impugned award under Section 34 of the Act and it was dismissed with costs...
The Court upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court and held that the arbitral tribunal can recall the order and re-commence the proceedings after the termination of proceedings under Section 25(a) on sufficient cause being shown by the Claimant..
The Supreme Court has made it clear that the directions of the NCDRC have been upheld save and except for reducing the compensation for delaying handing over flats from 7 pc to 6 pc and also declaring that the NCDRC’s direction for the refund of park..
The Court holds that Mr. Madhu Sharma is guilty of violating the undertaking before the Court. However, the Court will not be proceeding further to initiate a criminal contempt proceedings against Mr. Madhu Sharma for filing contrary affidavit before..
It was held that an anti-arbitration injunction suit does not lie, making the suits not maintainable and the Court dismissed them without costs..
In the light of recent court orders in Arnab Goswami and Varavara Rao case, this court order supporting the protesting farmers is actually a breath of fresh air since the judicial institutions and extends it support to protect fundamental rights of d..
The appeal was allowed and the order of the High Court granting bail to the respondents on the short ground that they could not be remanded to the custody before the order committing them to the Court of Sessions is made, was set aside...
The impugned order of the Madras High Court was set aside and this appeal was allowed. The parties were at liberty to approach the Orissa High Court seeking for appointment of the arbitrator...
The impugned judgment was set aside, and the Section 34 petition was ordered to be presented in the Courts in New Delhi, as was held by the learned Single Judge of the Special Commercial Court at Gurugram...
he High Court should ordinarily not direct any Subordinate Court to decide the bail application the same day, as that would be interfering with the judicial discretion of the Court hearing the bail application. However, as stated above, when the bail..
Legality of the order forfeiting the bail bond given by the appellant for non-compliance of the procedure..
The Court did not find any error in the order of the high court in overturning the order, refusing bail and extending the benefit to the respondent and accordingly the appeal failed and was dismissed. ..
The court held that Magistrate violated the provisions of CrPc by postponing the hearing of application bail and allowed for the release of appellants for bail with amounts payable to the Judicial Magistrate...
In the light of the above, the stand of the respondent state by way of preliminary objection was sustained and it as held that the present writ jurisdiction case seeking primarily the quashing of the judicial order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate an..
The Court held disposed the appeal by observing and clarifying the order of the High Court to the extent that the appellant State of Gujarat shall be at liberty to raise all questions relating to additions of the Sections on the basis of the FIR...
The Single Judge erred in law in holding that he was devoid of jurisdiction so far as the application presented to him by the Appellant. The impugned Order was thus set aside. The appeal is allowed with terms...
The Court released the accused/applicant on the bail on furnishing her personal bond and two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Roorkee. Bail application stood allowed accordingly...
These appeals arise out the judgment and orders dated 2nd July, 2012, 6th July, 2012 and 6th August, 2012, passed by the Delhi High Court in Crl. M.C. No.2180 of 2012...
All and sundry cannot approach the magistrate for recording of their statement u/s 164 and any witness, unsponsored by the IO/prosecution, cannot seek to get his examination recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C...
Member Strength 9,49,726 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
