The only issue for consideration in both the appeals is whether criminal proceedings initiated by the appellant herein at Gaya against her husband and his relatives are maintainable or not for lack of jurisdiction?..
This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 19.01.2010 passed by the Allahabad High Court whereby the High Court allowed the revision petition preferred by the respondent holding that values of "bottles" and "crates" are to be treate..
Narmada Bai-the petitioner herein, mother of Tulsiram Prajapati-the deceased, who, according to her, was killed on 27/28.12.2006 in a fake encounter by respondent Nos. 6 to 19, who are the officials of Gujarat and Rajasthan Police, somewhere on the r..
This Special Leave Petition was filed against an interim order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short "National Commission") on May 18, 2004 in Revision Petition No.3183 of 2003 filed there, on behalf of t..
This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by a Division Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court by which it has allowed the intra-court appeal filed by respondent No.1, set aside the judgment and order passed by a single Judge of the High C..
Six persons - the appellants and two others - were sent up for trial, inter alia, for various offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (`IPC') initially to the Court of IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar; later on trial was trans..
These two appeals, though coming from separate judgments and orders passed by the Bombay High Court, arise from the same suit for eviction instituted by the landlord which figures in both the appeals as respondent no.1. The appellant in the appeal ar..
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 26th June, 2008 delivered in LPA No.978 of 2007 by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, this appeal has been filed by the original petitioner-appellant herein. ..
The respondents filed a suit against the appellants in the year 2000 for recovery of possession of the suit premises and mesne profits. The said suit was decreed on 23.8.2003 in so far as the prayer for possession. The prayer for mesne profits was re..
This is an appeal for setting aside order dated 3.8.2007 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, "the National Commission") whereby the revision preferred by the appellant against the order passed by the State Consumer Disp..
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 16.12.2005 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 73843 of 2005 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court...
This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 29.10.2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 397 of 2001 whereby the High Court held the respondents therein guilty of the o..
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.5.2004 passed by learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court in Civil revision No. 945 of 2002...
The perennial question whether accused deserve to be convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter shall be referred as 'I.P.C.') as held by the trial court and upheld by the High Court or whether the conviction should be converte..
This appeal, under Section 116A of the Representation of People Act, 1951, is directed against judgment dated December 2, 2008, rendered by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Election Petition No. 2 of 2006 by which..
Appellant as Complainant filed a criminal complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida (U.P.) on 23.7.2004, under Sections 138 and 141 of the Act. It was alleged in the said complaint that cheques bearing nos.382874 and 38..
Section 16(3) as amended, does not impose any restriction on the property right of such children except limiting it to the property of their parents. Therefore, such children will have a right to whatever becomes the property of their parents whether..
selection and appointment of all the other 83 respondents are set aside for having indulged in malpractices and for grossly violating the instructions to the candidates..
selection and appointment of all the other 83 respondents are set aside for having indulged in malpractices and for grossly violating the instructions to the candidates..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
