Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Judgments and Orders

Protection against Jeopardy amd appeal was allowed partly

 18 July 2011

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31.05.1997 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 33/1996 arising out of FIR 22/1992 under Section 302 IPC registeredat Police Station Bara Hindu Rao. By virtue o..

Posted in Criminal Law |   1385 hits

Allocation is as per the Rank except other rules applicable

 16 July 2011

The facts very briefly are that in the Civil Services Examination, 2004 conducted by the Union Public Service Commission, Avinash Mohanty and Vikrama Varma amongst others were selected for appointment to the Indian Police Service (for short ‘the IPS’..

Posted in Civil Law |   2902 hits

No interest on Earnest Money

 16 July 2011

On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a contract for the work of Provision of Signaling Arrangements at “C” Class Stations on Igatpuri-Bhusawal Section and 2 “C” Stations on Bhusawal-Badnera Section of Bhusawal Division of Central Railway at..

Posted in Corporate Law |   2352 hits

Experience get preference

 13 July 2011

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8210 of 2010 filed by the Food and Beverage Foundation Society and four other organizations seeks the setting aside of the selection of non-profit organizations („NPOs‟)/non-governmental organizations („NGOs‟) by the Governm..

Posted in Corporate Law |   2552 hits

Leave is granted in case of disclosing such fact disentitle to obtain order

 13 July 2011

This is a petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 against impugned order dated 22.01.11 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller whereby the petitioner-tenant’s application for grant of leave to defend the eviction ..

Posted in Civil Law |   4084 hits

Dowry cause death and Appeal was Dismissed

 13 July 2011

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.07.1997 and the order on sentence dated 22.07.1997, which were delivered / passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.1/1994 arising out of FIR No.86/1990 registere..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2380 hits

I. R. Cohelo Vs. State Of Tamilnadu: An Analysis Of The Case Relating To 9th Schedule Under Indian Constitution

 11 July 2011

An Analysis Of The Case Relating To 9th Schedule Under Indian Constitution..

Posted in Constitutional Law |   4591 hits

Sine qua non of criminal conspiracy

 11 July 2011

The ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy have been reiterated by the Supreme Court..

Posted in Criminal Law |   3722 hits

Last seen theory and burden of poof

 11 July 2011

Last seen theory and burden of poof..

Posted in Criminal Law |   4123 hits

Maintenance petition

 11 July 2011

..

Posted in Family Law |   4283 hits

Burglary Insurance

 11 July 2011

..

Posted in Others 1 comments |   2797 hits

Limitation of Companies Act in case of mismanagement

 11 July 2011

Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 [hereinafter referred to as the Act] was filed before the Calcutta High Court on grounds of oppression and mismanagement. The learned Company Judge held that the Petitioners grievance in regard to ouster ..

Posted in Corporate Law |   3524 hits

Landmark judgment on 156 (3) Cr. P.C.

 11 July 2011

if a person has a grievance that the police station is not registering his FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C., then he can approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. by an application in writing. Even if that does not yield any sat..

Posted in Criminal Law 2 comments |   32701 hits

Appeal was allowed partly and order convict the appellant under section 304 part-II

 07 July 2011

Briefly stated the prosecution case is that the appellant was residing in a house situate at Yadwal Street, Poovam Koticherri, Distt. Karaikal, Tamil Nadu. Apart from his wife Smt. Dhanalakshmi, PW2 and his daughter Abirami, aged about 1½ years, his ..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2463 hits

Petition was allowed as per clause 6(III) and the order set aside

 06 July 2011

1. The challenge in this writ petition by De Nora India Limited („DNIL‟) [formerly known as Titanor Components Limited („TCL‟)] is to an order dated 12th August 2010 passed by the Department of Commerce („DOC‟) (Supply Division) in the Ministry of Co..

Posted in Others |   2644 hits

Application filed under rule 6 and 9 of the companies rule 1959 is rejected by HC

 06 July 2011

Company Applications No. 578-579/2011 have been filed by the Department of Telecommunication (in short ‘DOT’) under Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for recall and stay of this Court’s order dated 5th February, 2010 by virtue of whi..

Posted in Corporate Law |   4130 hits

HC dismissed the appeal with cost on the question of Forzid Registered of Trade Mark

 06 July 2011

The Petitioner UBPL states that it is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacturing and selling of pharmaceutical preparations including injections bearing the trade mark FORZID. UBPL claims that since 2002 it took steps to launch CEFTAZIDIME injections ..


Petition filed u/s 433(a)/439 of Comp.Act,1956 dismissed for unjustified ground for VoluntaryWinding

 06 July 2011

Mr. Beri submits that the petitioner-company has not done any business since 2001-2002 and thus, it has not earned any income for the last ten years. He states there is no hope or prospect of the petitioner-company doing any further business as state..

Posted in Corporate Law |   3716 hits

Judgment done by the SC on the basis of the confession is not sustained and the appeal was allowed

 05 July 2011

The three appellants are serving life sentences for committing murder of one Dile Ram. They were never on bail and have, thus, completed over ten years of incarceration. We, therefore, intended to grant leave in the case and release the appellants on..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2502 hits

Appeal dismissed by HC on question of time limit within which power und Rule29(1)(vi) is exercisable

 05 July 2011

This appeal by Union of India is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.08.2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No. 16575 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the application of the ap..

Posted in Others |   3722 hits