The issue which falls for consideration in the present appeal is whether the treatment given or the process undertaken by the appellant to Helium gas purchased by it from the open market would amount to manufacture, rendering the goods liable to dut..
The seats allotted to OBC candidates in educational institutions can be filled up by General category students in case no suitable candidates are available in OBC..
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, s. 7 – Adoption by husband -This is clear from Section 7 of the Act. Proviso thereof makes it clear that a male Hindu cannot adopt except with the consent of the wife, unless the wife has completely and fina..
In writ appeal the Madras High court Madurai Bench allowed the request for alteration of date of birth made after a limitaion period of 5 years...
The material facts are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of insulated wires and cables falling under Central Excise Tariff Sub- Heading No.8544.00. The appellant claimed benefit under Notification no. 205/88 – C.E. dated 25.05.88 as a..
The respondent No. 1, M/s. Kalvert Foods India Pvt. Ltd. is a company (in short hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') engaged in the manufacture of P & P Food Products, such as, assorted jams, pickles, squashes, cooking sauces, chutneys, syrups, ..
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 4, 6, 7, 8(2) and 278; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 45ZA; Banking Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985 - Rule 2(1)-The money lying deposited in the account of the original depositor should be distribute..
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, O. 1 r. 8: Apart from being a representative suit, the suit was filed by an aggrieved person whose right to use public street of 10 feet width was prejudicially affected. Since affected person himself has filed a suit, ..
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — sections 482, 205, 313 — power to examine the accused — Being aggrieved with the order granting a general exemption to the accused from personal appearance before the Trial Court, the complainant filed this appeal — th..
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, s. 7 - Adoption by husband -This is clear from Section 7 of the Act. Proviso thereof makes it clear that a male Hindu cannot adopt except with the consent of the wife, unless the wife has completely and fina..
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Bail - Grant of— bail granted to the respondent-dentist — under challenge — seven assailants came in a Maruti Van and assaulted Prof. T.J. Jacob and chopped off his right palm. The role attributed to the respondent is ..
Motor accident claim - Meaning of Third party - Any party, which is not a contracting party to the policy of insurance will automatically be referred to and called as a third party because it is neither the first party (the insurer) nor the second p..
HOW TO PROCEED WHEN CAUSE OF ACTION IS OUT SIDE INDIA 498A CASES..
Daughter in Law of the deceased is one among the family members for the purpose of compassionate appointment..
..
The facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that the Respondent-company undertakes various music projects in India and under these projects it enters into agreements with reputed artists for composing and recording musical works. The m..
The appellant-company, previously known as M/s. Eicher Limited –unit Royal Enfield Motors, are manufacturing motorcycles falling under Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue relates to non-inclusion of the value of packing charg..
Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire; i.e. a man will not meet his Maker with a lie in his mouth. A dying man is face to face with his Maker without any motive for telling a lie. 23. Truth said Mathew Arnold, sits upon the lips of a dying man . 24...
To prove quilt of an accused person by circumstantial evidence. They are:- (1) The circumstance from which tile conclusion is drawn should be fully proved; (2) the circumstances should he conclusive in nature; (3)all the facts so established should..
Though dying declaration is indirect evidence being a specie of hearsay, yet it is an exception to the rule against admissibility of hearsay evidence. Indeed, it is substantive evidence and like any other substantive evidence requires no corroboratio..