@ Mr. Biswanath Roy, you got me confused now.
You said the divorce depends upon judiciary and protesting false allegations depends upon contestants. My understanding is that the so called contestant is being a contestant in the first place because he was protesting the false allegations which has been the reason for the ground of divorce. If judiciary determines the divorce based on this reason then how can both not be mixed up?
If I do not protest now and protest later after letting her obtain the divorce order from the court , I believe, the onus will be on me to prove that the allegations are false. Whereas, now the onus is on her to prove the allegations are true. This is just my opinion as I am not an expert but a victim, so just trying to understand the system.
like you suggested the only reason i'm planning to contest is to uphold my self respect , else i do not give a damn about her. My opinion is, there seems to be a fine line between standing up for one's self respect and being egoistic. Egoism only arises when one is too proud to admit one's mistake even if one is aware of it. Often people mistake self-respect aspect for being egoistic.