LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raghu Torgal   17 February 2020

who is the io both cases ate coynter case

who is the io both cases ate coynter case


 5 Replies

Akshay (Advocate)     17 February 2020

Hi

Unable to understand what you want to ask, may  you please repeat  your query.

Regards,

Akshay Gupta

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     17 February 2020

Originally posted by : Raghu Torgal
who is the io both cases ate coynter case

1. IO (investigating Officer) can be common, wherein both Parties file "Counter Cases" against each other, in the same police station, on the same duty shift of the IO.  However the Senior Station Police Inspector, has exclusive discretion to depute another IO for the second parties counter complaint.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
VISIT: www.chshelpforum.com

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     17 February 2020

Originally posted by : Raghu Torgal
who is the io both cases ate coynter case

1. IO (investigating Officer) can be common, wherein both Parties file "Counter Cases" against each other, in the same police station, on the same duty shift of the IO.  However the Senior Station Police Inspector, has exclusive discretion to depute another IO for the second parties counter complaint.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
VISIT: www.chshelpforum.com

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     17 February 2020

Originally posted by : Raghu Torgal
who is the io both cases ate coynter case

1. IO (investigating Officer) can be common, wherein both Parties file "Counter Cases" against each other, in the same police station, on the same duty shift of the IO.  However the Senior Station Police Inspector, has exclusive discretion to depute another IO for the second parties counter complaint.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
VISIT: www.chshelpforum.com

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     18 February 2020

Incomplete and vague facts can not lead to form an opinion and oblige.

It is advisable to consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for appreciation of facts/ documents, professional guidance and necessary proceeding.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading