why should one fight against corruption when he is himself on the wrong side. He is against corruption it is well and good. It is appreciable worth encouraging. But why his first experiment with corruption should be a loosing bargain.
He doe snot have much evidence as on now against corruption. But the evidence will be there when he is convicted and identifies that there were three constables who omitted to arrest him then and there and if not able to stand bail send him in lock up. Later on produce before court next working day only to be fined few Rupees.
but why doe she not fight against corruption where he himself is not wrong and he himself is not to suffer.
If he ends up sufferer in first fight against corruption (as apparent) (as also advised by Mr Qureshi) then zeal to fight again is subdued