There is an Agreement to Sell which is forged by a person. The forged Agreement to Sell bears the signatures of two witness and one witness died and another witness gave statement that the the sell has not signe in his presence or h the money transaction was done in his presenc. Of course this statemwent was obtaine by the I,O who was of ASI rank insteadof SI as IO. Again after few months the living Witness changed his statement before thr I.O. who is S.I.. Now after the death of one witness whether the forged Agreement to Sell has any value. When the only living Witness contradict the his own earlier Statement what could be the next course of Actioin either by the polic or by the Complainant. Moreover the so-called Agreement to Sell, Cheque and Cash receipts alleged to have made to usurb the property of the Respondent, are all missing now. Under thus situation what should be done by the Respondent. Further the investigation has completed three yesrs but so far nothing came off.
