Sayed Maqsood Ahmed 07 June 2024
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 07 June 2024
The decision to levy such charges was taken in a agm and not by any individual's dictates.
The resolution was passed by the majority members and not done just like that.
The AGM minutes are forwarded to the deputy registrar concerned and approval obtained.
If it was passed by the AGM then there can be no illegality i it.
The move in and move out exerts extra work on Security, Administration and Housekeeping staff. Also there is extra usage of water, lifts and common area. Apart from all this, there is a wear and tear that happens when house movement takes place. The amount was arrived at after reviewing the damages to the common area.
Therefore the charges levied are justified.
Sayed Maqsood Ahmed 07 June 2024
Many thanks sir for your valuable comments.
But tenants are not covered under Maharashtra Cooperative Housing Society Act 1960. Would appreciate if you could share any bye law or section or rule.
Sorry for inconvenience
Best regards
Sayed Maqsood Ahmed 15 August 2024
Thank you
Best regards
Pravin Patil 18 March 2026
Hello sir,
When ther eis a provision for 10% NON OCCUPANCY CHARGES (over and above EQUAL mainatainance chareges) to be collected from the member who rented his/her flat. Also the By laws specifically mention that Lift maintainance, Security,Administration etc to be charged equally. How is this extra Shifting Charges justified? The so called extra usage of the services is very vague term. Also the Bylaws does not explicitlly mention any term called as Shifting Charges. Why 10% NON OCCUPANCY CHARGES are allowed to be levied in bylaws. - The society is already earning 10% extra from such rented flats and not giving any SPECIAL SERVBICE EXCLUSIVELLY to these members. In the light of above please guide me how can the Shifting Charges be Justified?
Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate ) 22 March 2026
Bye-Laws adopted by your society are required to be perused by a local prudent lawyer before forming an opinion and advise.