An ancestral property was sold for 8000 INR three months before acquiring a new property for 32000 INR by my father. There is no mention in the sale agreement or any evidence available that the new property was bought with 8000 INR money got from the ancestral property. My father has two sons (i am one of the sons) and two daughters.
The new property bought my father was gift deeded to me and my brother in 2009 as two separate gift deeds. My two sisters filed a case against the new property bought by my father saying that it was bought using the money (i.e. 8000 INR) of the ancestral property without any evidence and hence, the gift deed made in favor of myself and my brother is not valid. The case is under prosecution now.
Now, my sisters are ready to give Emancipation Deed for my brother as they have a good relationship with my brother, but they are not ready to give Emancipation Deed for me, or nor ready for compromise. They are saying that they would like to continue the case on the gift deed made in favour of me and give Emancipation Deed for my brother to relieve him from the case.
Is it possible the case can be continued only on the gift deed made in favour of me as the case was filed on the original property, not on the gift deed property?
I seek some help on how to tackle this matter.
Muruga
