LCI Learning
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anita V.Patil (General Manager)     29 December 2011

Review petition

What is the time limit for review petition in Highcourt? If SLP is filed in Supreme court, whether it is advisable to file a review petition in Highcourt?


 4 Replies

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     01 January 2012

normally review has very limited scope.



Anand k (Professor)     03 January 2012

Very sad to note the following by Chandran, his story is pathetic, I need some great soul to help this gentleman. A talented criminal lawyer to take up this issue and teach good lesson to the intruders and land grabbing robbers =


Chandran Peechulli Peechulli= LAND GRABBING. Detailed complaint in brief: e.g. Family PARTITION-SUIT O.S. 341/2004 with Bangalore City Civil - Court. Land-grabbing case. Self, purchased 2 plots for my two sons, of the 32 plots formed in a layout of one acre and 20 Guntas,in 1983. Signatories of Vendors were three members (Karthas for the ancestoral property) the grandsons of Sri. Eeraiah. No.1 Mr. Krishnappa son of Eeranna totally left out from the suit and the other two signatories 2. Mr.Thamayanna and 3. Mr. Eranna (No.2 & 3 are sons of Sri.Kempiah-these two parties though made a party, not attending the court but for submitting the vakalat by their advocate,which is Suppression of unlawful Act. Neither objection nor evidence filed till to date by the member No.2 or 3. Please note self, P.K.Chandran alone made a party in their Family Partition Suit O.S.341/ 2004, amongst the 32 plot owners of a layout, self discriminated being a non-local, since residing in Chennai port City, having taken subsequent profession at sea, in the merchant navy, as a bread-winner to my wife and two young sons and my parents. O.S.341/2004, Family Partition- Suit by the appellant, was to harass and humiliate. After 21 long years, younger relative members of vendors family (miscreants) goons taking law into their hands, owing to the increased land-prices (caused by modernisation of urban land by highways, bridges, and bye-pass roads), RAMA and LAXMANA, twins (miscreants) encroached my land and removed the barbed wire fencing connected to the stone pillars erected on the boundary line, by putting up a KATCHA SHED on my land to knock of my hard-earned property of mine, an ex-serviceman( who once came forward to join the Indian Army to lay his life for safeguarding the nation from external threats). Promptly, reported to all Civil Authorities of Law & Order and Bangalore City Police Commissioner who referred me to the then Police IGP, Bangalore Rural, Sri Rabindranath Tagore, I.P.S., who arranged to chase the encroachers, who were erecting a KATCHA SHED, which was left in incomplete condition, thereby advising me to approach the CIVIL COURT for justice, hence the suit O.S.365/2004, filed by me, against miscreants. The numbering of my case-file was deliberately delayed, shunting me to CHENNAI to bring and submit all the original land documents to the C.C.C. (City Civil Court) Bangalore, for accepting my case submitted, in the Junior Division Rural, hence the case delayed and numbered as O.S.365/2004. While, in the meanwhile, miscreants filed a partition-suit which was numbered earlier as (O.S.341/2004) in Sr.Divn. of Bangalore C.C.C. Heartlessly and mercilessly my case filed O.S.365/2004, was dismissed twice saying they (miscreants) are in possession "though in forceful possession illegally", speaks of the poor Law and Order, and my plight for fairness and justice. The truth falsified in favour of the miscreants, hence these days, criminals are encouraged to grow in our country. With the money and muscle-power, the miscreants went ahead in converting the katcha-shed, as a residential with ventilation opening and fitting window, and obtaining electrical connection during the pendency of the case and status quo, which is a violation of court-order and contempt of court. Forcefully occupying illegally thereafter. They then threatened the neighbourhood not to support or cooperate with me(resident of chennai) with the result even the neighbour who signed the registered Sale Deed as my witness, was warned of dire- consequence if he stands as witness and hence over the telephone conveyed his plight since his daughters and son may be harmed, therefore he keeping aloof without appearing as witness in my favour, to my case O.S.365/2004. In 1983, I have paid the full sales consideration to the vendors directly, as they were illiterate they had engaged a local medical practitioner (Dr. Narasimhamurthy), to assist the vendors in interpreting Kannada language into English language to those prospective buyers, who were not proficient in Kannada. I am in legal- possession, by virtue of irrevocable GPA and Affidavit (for the delivery of possession transferred to me), same as those of others who purchased in 1983, while registration were stopped. Why this awakening after 21 long years by the youngsters in the family of Mr. Kempiah, who were minors in 1983 and harming me alone. Heartlessly and mercilessly the case O.S.341/2004, with Senior Division, Bangalore (Rural), City Civil Court being adjourned again on 14th October 2011 to 24th November 2011, now again to 4th January 2012. The Honourable Courts have not taken into consideration, the hurt sentiments of an aggrieved ex-serviceman and senior citizen aged 64 years old, coming to attend court from Chennai to Bangalore and back, since the year 2004, Now, 8th year, incurring time, effort and money during my retired life, for no fault of mine, having not considered an interim relief at least. Is there, a human soul in our country, to come to my rescue and instil justice of mankind, thereby cleansing of the existing system. Everything is said and documented in the Code of Judicial Conduct but who is to check, as to whether the said is put into practice. Has the Government earmarked someone to keep a check for its implementation? Hence, Every enlightened citizen in the local region, practically coming up, as the Rights & Social- Activist, locally voicing citizen's right, same put forward in the common interest, to the Local and Corporate Centres for their attention, to improve the citizen services and instil fairness, truth & justice, through Parliament or Lokpal. Please note: Particularly last three-hearings of their PARTITION SUIT were unreasonably adjourned for longer periods while I was prepared to be cross-examined. * the evidence, submitted in the beginning of the year, * travelled from Chennai though sick, and being 65 yrs. old. (w/B.P. hyper-tension and diabetic). Rightly said by Justice Dhingra and as well as Ace criminal lawyer Ram Jetmalini Re-TOI Chennai Edn. Dt. 30-11-2011. A Case study (O.S.341/2004) in Sr.Divn. of Bangalore City Civil Court LAND GRAB CASE. Local land-grabbers liberally given adjournments, while the aggrieved litigant resident of Chennai, (Senior Citizen and Ex-serviceman) though long prepared for the cross-examination, is totally harassed and humiliated by returning the said senior citizen back to Chennai with repeated liberal adjournments. Need for better regulatory- mechanism, in the administration of Law in our country, to in still fairness and justice in courts irrespective of the class of courts whether Lower or Higher Court. Re-piling-up of cases and dragged delays with unreasonable adjournments, liberal to the influenced and the mighty, making the innocent litigant to suffer and give up. SHOULD THIS NOT BE PROBED BY THE INDEPENDANT CBI OR THE LOKAYUTH? THE POOR COMMON MAN SUFFERS WITH SLOW DEATH. ACCUSED BEING ENCOURAGED GOING UNPUNISHED. Land grabbing-encouraging criminals. liberal adjournments. LAND GRABBING. Detailed complaint in brief: e.g. Family PARTITION-SUIT O.S. 341/2004 w

Dr.Chandran Peechulli (Chief Consultants)     05 January 2012

Young Law graduates to measure your skills that are considered essential for success in law school as alumni– with critical-thinking skills, such as logical reasoning and problem solving. These skills are considered as key to success in the practice of law throughout the world in performance of performance efficiency. Minutes of the Court-Hall hearings.Valued thoughts do not just emerge. They are solutions or pathway to ultimate solutions, to the need of the hour. It emerges to the times of necessity, “necessity is the mother of invention” Perception and vision of individuals vary, which is knitted with various attributes in the making of the mind-set. Hence, the need to inter-act and come to a consensus. ……………….. Dr.Chandran Peechulli.

CASE STUDY: Feedback of Court hearing 4th Jan.2012. City Civil Courts Bangalore @ Sr. Division Bangalore (Rural). Awaiting cross-examination from July 2011 when counter to objections were submitted which followed with series of liberal adjournments to blame excuses by the land grabbing party. Case dragged on from 2004, self one purchaser made only as a party within their family partition suit, as the other buyers of the remaining 30 of the 32 plot- layout made in 1983 were although, also sold out then itself, in 1983 but they were not made a party since locals. All the 32 plot purchasers of this layout also purchased from Krishanappa son of Eeranna, AND Thamayanna and Eeranna,  boths sons of Kempiah . Ancestor property of Eeriah

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register