Suppose A sales to B,B want to return flat after whole sales deed,does he have to do all stamping and all process again?
adv.raghavan (Advocate,9444674980) 07 January 2014
yes he has to re convey the flat back to seller, or he has to move appropriate civil court to obtain decree for cancellation of sale deed, I do not advice to go for CANCELLATION deed it does not create or assign property rights back to the seller.
adv.raghavan (Advocate,9444674980) 08 January 2014
different states have variable stamp duty and reg.fees, so i advice to chk with local counsel in this regard.
S.QAISAR ALI ADV. (Advocate) 08 January 2014
yes to sell the property again whole process to follow is necessary
SKapoor_Lawkonect (Lawyer) 09 January 2014
Hi Sagar, I think that you should again go for a sale deed all over again as in the facts and circumstances of your case as enumerated by you if you go for cancellation deed as mentioned by the Madras High Court in the case of G.D.Subramaniam v The Sub Registrar (Writ Petition No.8657 of 2008) you will have to follow all the requirements of Section 32A of Registration Act, 1908 the HC in the above mentioned case has observed that A deed of cancellation of a sale executed by mutual consent by all parties to the sale deed, if presented for registration, the registering Officer is bound to register the same provided the other requirements like Section 32-A of the Registration Act have been complied with. It shall just be kept in mind that a sale deed cannot be cancelled unilaterally but with regard to rights transferred it is similar to a sale deed if it fulfills the requirements of Section 32 A of Registeration Act. As the registeration requirements in both is nearly the same you can for either depending upon the cost as the rates of stamp duty will vary from state to stae.
adv.raghavan (Advocate,9444674980) 09 January 2014
I disagree with the above contentions, would like to present a judgment here. Madras High Court has held that a deed of cancellation of a sale unilaterally executed by the transferor does not create, assign, limit or extinguish any right, title or interest in the property and is of no effect.
A Full Bench comprising the Chief Justice M.Y. Eqbal, and Justices P. Jyothimani and T.S. Sivagnanam, in its judgment on two appeals, said such a document did not create any encumbrance in the property already transferred.
Hence, such a deed of cancellation could not be accepted for registration.
Originally, Syeda Aamina Raheem filed a writ petition challenging the registration of a unilaterally executed cancellation of a sale deed. She said she purchased 2500 sq.feet land at Kakkalur village, Tiruvallur district. A sale deed was registered in November 1996. She claimed that she paid the entire sale consideration and she was in possession of the property. However, Latif Estate Line India Ltd., Kilpauk, unilaterally executed the cancellation deed in August 2007 which was also registered.
The same was the case of Hadeeja Ammal in respect of a property measuring 3010 sq.feet at Thirumullaivoyal near here.
The company denied the allegation. It stated that the writ petitioners were not in possession of the property. It continued to be in possession of the same.
A single Judge in February 2009 held that the cancellation deed had been executed unilaterally by the company without the knowledge and consent of the petitioners and without complying with Section 32-A of the Registration Act. He allowed the writ petitions.
Against this, appeals were filed. A Division Bench doubting the correctness of a judgment in 2008 followed by the single Judge, referred the present appeals to a Full Bench.
The Full Bench concluded that once a title to the property was vested in the transferee by the sale of the property, it could not be divested unto the transferor by a cancellation deed even with the consent of the parties. The proper course would be to reconvey the property by a deed of conveyance by the transferee in favour of the transferor.
Where a transfer was effected by way of sale with the condition that title would pass on payment of consideration, and such intention was clear from the recital in the deed, then such sale could be cancelled with the consent of both the parties on the ground of non-payment of consideration. The reason was that in such a sale deed, admittedly, the title remained with the transferor.
In other cases, a complete and absolute sale could be cancelled at the instance of the transferor only by taking recourse to the civil court by obtaining a decree of cancellation of sale deed on the ground inter alia of fraud or any other valid reason.
The Bench referred the appeals back to the court concerned for deciding the case on merits.