Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Bhawani Mahapatra (Law Officer)     26 April 2011

Refusal to receive FIR

Dear Experts

I work in a Telecom Company in Orissa. In last few months, about 8-10 numbers of Cellular Towers were burned/exploded by the maoists. We went to the concern police station for lodging FIR against unknown miscrents, but the Officer incharge of Police stations are not accepting FIR against the maoists for threat to their life. The we moved to the concern police Superintendent to report the matter, but same thing happened. Lastly we moved to the local Judicial court & filed a petition u/s-39 Cr.P.C. but the Magistrate is also not interested to consider our petition. He rather advise us to file a complain petition u/s-201 Cr.p.c.

Our intention is not to prosecute the miscrents, rather to record the happenings at the police station/court and to claim insurance against the loss.

Is there any other way/remedy to record the incidence with the police/court.

Sec-39 Cr.P.C is quoted for immediate reference.

9. Public to give information of certain offences. 

(1) Every person, aware of the Commission of, or of the intention of any other person to commit, any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely.

 (i) Sections 121 to 126, both inclusive, and section 130 (that is to say offences against the State specified in Chapter VI of the said Code);

 (ii) Sections 143, 144, 145, 147 and 148 (that is to say, offences against the public tranquillity specified in Chapter VIII of the said Code);

 (iii) Sections 161 to 165A, both inclusive (that is to say, offences relating to illegal gratification);

 (iv). Sections 272 to 278, both inclusive (that is to say, offences relating to adulteration of food and drugs, etc.); 

(v) Sections 302, 303 and 304 (that is to say, offences affecting life);

1[(va) section 364A (that is to say, offence relating to kidnapping for ransom, etc);] 

(vi) Section 382 (that is to say., offence of theft after preparation made for causing, death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft); 

(vii) Sections 392 to 399, both inclusive, and section 402 (that is to say, offences (if robbery and dacoity);

 (viii) Section 409 (that is to say, offence relating to criminal breach of trust by public servant, etc.);

 (ix) Sections 431 to 439, both inclusive (that is to say, offence of mischief against property);

 (x) Sections 449 and 450 (that is to say, offence of house-trespass); 

(xi) Sections 456 to 460, both inclusive (that is to say, offences of lurking house trespass); and

 (xii) Sections 489A to 489E, both inclusive (that is to say, offences relating to currency notes and bank notes).

 Shall, in the absences of any reasonable excuse, the burden of proving which excuse shall lie upon the person so aware, forthwith give information to the nearest Magistrate or police officer of such Commission or intention;

 (2) For the purposes of this section, the term "offence" includes any act committed at any place out of India, which would constitute an offence if committed in India.



Learning

 4 Replies

pratik (self working)     26 April 2011

good like to know now what to do ?

Manas Prakash (Advocate)     27 April 2011

You are rightly advised by the magistrate to complain u/s 200 of Cr.PC.In such case Magistrate after taking evidence of two witnesses and your statment on solomn affirmation he may take Cognizance of the case or instruct the police to register F.I.R or even  inquire himself and issue summon to the accused persons.If the Magistrate do not take cognizance then he has to give reasoned order for dismissing the same.Against that dismissal order you may go in revision in Session Court and in High Court or in Supreme Court also in SLP. 

Justice may delay but can not be denied.Good luck.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     27 April 2011

"Our intention is not to prosecute the miscrents, rather to record the happenings at the police station/court and to claim insurance against the loss. Is there any other way/remedy to record the incidence with the police/court."

to claim insurance against the loss

WITHOUT FIR & INVESTIGATION YOUR COMPANY WILL NOT GET INSURANCE CLAIM

- DO NOT TAKE IT OTHERWAY THAT, MIGHT BE YOUR COMPANY INVOLVED IN THE MATTER FOR GETTING INSURANCE CLAIM. THEREFORE FIR & INVESTIGATION IS MUST.

FILE PETITION AS DIRECTED BY THE JUDGE.

EVEN YOU GO TO HIGHER AUTHORITY, THEY ALSO TELL THE SAME THING.

Bhawani Mahapatra (Law Officer)     27 April 2011

Dear Sir

My question is whether a Magistrate can refuse to entertain a petition u/s-39 Cr.P.C. whereas there is every condition is fulfilled to consider it. Why should he ask to go for alternative remedy, i.e. to file petition u/s 200 Cr.P.C


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register