my query is related
I am not party in a civil RFA before HC. But HC passed comments which indicts me criminally in fraud. The entire paragraph is contrary to facts and evidence before HC. HC in another para States contrary to evidence by my predecessor in the suit add witness for obvious reasons.
Few others non parties who are made similar related comments went to expunge. HC said it will not expunge as it is the reason and basis for judgement.. This criminal indictments were the reason that includes comments on me.
Now I have proof that assumptions in
comment by HC is completely wrong. ie accounts is not branch accounts but that of a society is confirmed by CA institute. HC took it as branch account. Lower Court clearly found prima facie accounts aren't branch account. HC didn't controvert this.
Suit is in appeal before SC.
Order 47 permit review to me. Expunge is known waste.
Should I file SLP or IA to implead?
Can I ask verdict to be set aside, since basis is wrong?
Can and should I ask for remand of suit to impressed me and opportunity to be heard
I practice in same HC now as lawyer. Should I file writ UA 32 inserted of review
I want to prosecute judge for his misdemeanour in causing injustice and making observations for extraneous consideration and defaming me
Thanks in advance