PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS ORDER?
" In the result, the additional question of law raised is answered accordingly and the second appeal is allowed, the decree and judgment passed by the 1st appellate court is set aside and the matter is remitted to the court below for fresh disposal in accordance with law. The trial court is directed to give an opportunity to the plaintiff to implead the plaintiff in O.S.No.465/68 of Principal Munsiff Court, Wadakkancherry and after procuring his presence and giving opportunity to both parties to adduce further evidence, if any required, then dispose of the case afresh in accordance with law. Considering the circumstances of case, the parties are directed to bear their respective cost in the appeal. The parties are directed to appear before the Munsiff Court, Wadakkancherry on 06.11.2017. Registry is directed to communicate this judgment to the court below and also send back the records to the court below at the earliest."
1. **Does the above remand order mean the plaintiff can submit a fresh plaint, or does the previous plaint still continue?**
2. **Can the parties adduce fresh evidence in the remanded trial?**
3. **What happens to the evidence already adduced before the remand? Does it need to be submitted again?**
4. **Will the trial court give a judgment without being influenced by previous orders before the trial?**
5. **Is there an option to appeal the order of the trial court in the new round of litigation?**
6. **What happens to the commission reports that were admitted during the period before the remand? Can the defendants rely on the adverse finding against the plaintiff in that report?**
7. **In the course of the trial after the remand, is it possible to send a commission to adjudicate any facts?**
