Minor added as consenting witness mistakenly

The vendor (father) was the absolute owner, and the sale deed was executed by him alone.

The wife and daughter were merely consenting witnesses — not co-owners, executants, or confirming parties.

A minor has no contractual capacity under Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Therefore, her signature as a “consenting witness” has no legal effect, positive or negative, on the sale deed’s validity.

The sale deed remains valid and enforceable because:

It was executed by the lawful owner.

Consideration passed.

Title was transferred under Section 54, Transfer of Property Act.

I fully agree and appreciate the opinion and advise of learned senior expert Mr. T Kalaiselvan.

Sale transaction is valid despite the fact one of the two witnesses (daughter) was minor at that point of time.

What is your concern / locus standi / problem?

Thank you Kalaiselvan Sir and Dr J C Vasishta Sir for your advise.

if understand correctly., the only part relating to Minor signing as Executant ( as consenting witness) become in operative , rest of the sale deed remains fully valid and enforceable.

However to make the records clean., if we get signed confirmation/rectification deed from Vendor removing Minor as consenting witness., rest all remaining same - Is this doable Sir ? 

Really appreciate your advise ? 

In my opinion, you may better remain silent about it without complicating the simple things.

The significance of consenting person is actually nil in the given situation hence you may act prudently.

No need to proceed, leave all ideas and efforts, everything is valid and in order.

Ok Sir thank you!