Levelling allegations against quasi judicial authorities in revison application filed after 4 months

At the present juncture, your focus ought be in defending the decsion of the Deputy Registrar. During the hearing hearing, you may bring the wild allegations to the notice of the Revisional Authority.

Thank you very much Advocate Venu for the reply. 

Woudl greatly appreciate if the forum also comments on the legal options that are now available to me for these wild allegations.

If the society has expressly denied your request in writing and you disagree with their decision, you may file an appeal with the Registrar. However keep in mind that the Registrar's decision in such cases is final, and he notifies the applicant and the society of it within 15 days. The Registrar typically responds to such appeals from the applicants three months after receiving them. If not, the Registrar notes the delay and lets everyone know why.In accordance with the conclusions reached by the later Division Bench in the case of Jain Mechants Co-Op Housing Society v. H.U.F. of Manubhai Kalyanbhai, The Court considered the issue of the Society's right to admit, deny, or refuse membership, and in light of the observations, the Court is of the opinion that the contention relating to an absolute and unrestricted right in favour of the Society to admit, deny, or refuse membership cannot be accepted for the simple reason that this Division Bench decision 1984 (2) 25 Guj LR 1244 itself as mentioned para 54 at page 1298 a right to be considered for be considered for membership is a right to be fair.Hence, the society is not endowed with such unflattering authority. If the society ever refuses or denies membership on a dubious or insignificant ground, the offended party will have the right to file a complaint with the Court or with the authorities under the Act. It does not make sense to accept that the society has any such absolute right when the person who has been denied membership has a right and remedy accessible to them.There is no foundation for the claim that the society's decision to admit someone to membership or to deny or refuse the same is not subject to scrutiny when the aggrieved party seeks the court or the appropriate authority. Court has also observed that as per aforementioned principles, participation in a cooperative society should be voluntary and open to anyone who can use its services and is willing to accept the obligations of membership, free from any artificial restrictions or social, political, racial, or religious discrimination.