If there is a similarity in the main prayer and final prayer , interim relief wouldnt be granted

This discussion seeks Karnataka case law to support the principle that if the main prayer in a legal document is similar to the final prayer, interim relief may not be granted. However, the request was deemed ambiguous by another user, who clarified that the 'main prayer' is typically in the plaint/petition and interim relief addresses acute, subsisting problems. Further context or clarification is needed to identify specific case law.