I find here
SEVEN YAKCHHA PRASHN which no lawyer like to face
SHOULD ADVOCACY BE A PUBLIC SERVICE ?
In the cases which are filed by the Government it should be the responsibility of the Government to provide legal aid / service to all against whom it has filed the cases.
In the cases wherein the Government is not a party the responsibility to provide defence Lawyer / Advocate to the opposition should be lied upon the claimant and finally upon the looser.
BUT, the Advocate / Legal aid should be provided by the Government.
The Advocates / Lawyer should be under PUBLIC SERVICE registered with the Government on the basis of some PAYMENT OF WAGES REGULATION alike.
The citizens should apply to Government to provide an Advocate / Legal Aid and accordingly should deposit the wages to the Government and the Advocate / Lawyer should be paid by the Government.
NO DIRECT TRANSACTION SHOULD BE BETWEEN ADVOCATE / LAWYER AS THE PUBLIC SERVANT. NO PRIVATE ADVOCATE SHOULD BE ALLOWED OFFICIALLY TO BE APPEAR BEFORE COURT.
ONLY, In the Business Matters the Private Advocate should be allowed, however, there should be some regulation for transactions through public service.
PAYER SHOULD BE THE MASTER AND SERVER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE LEGALLY.
WHO ARE THE MAIN ACCUSED FOR CORRUPTION IN JUDICIARY
Do the judges, who are corrupt, takes money DIRECTLY from the accused persons ?
It is who that proposes money to judges for favour ? ADVOCATES ? NO?
If NOT, so that question still stands there, so IT IS WHO ?
Is this not the story behind huge fees of so called BIG ADVOCATES ?
The BIG ADVOCATE means THE BIG MANAGER. NO ?
IN THIS ANGLE THE JUDGES SEEMS THE VICTIM OF CORRUPTION
BY ADVOCATES WHO PROPOSES AND GIVES MONEY TO JUDGES.
OTHERWISE HOW COULD IT BE DONE ? WHO ARE THEY DO THIS ?
CAN JUSTICE BE PROVIDED WITHOUT MONEY
OR IT ONLY FOR RICH
Why the Court proceedings are such difficult so that a poor common man is made helpless and away from seeking justice ?
Why the justice denied on technical grounds ?
The mass people those are struggling for one time bread in a day why they are kept away from getting justice without any role of money ?
Why the judicial system is made in which the common men cannot represent their case in a one-time one-day hearing in equally simple proceedings without hiring an advocate ?
At every step in judiciary the money matters so the real deserving poor people never reaching to courts. SO WHAT THE JUSTICE IS BEING DONE IN JUDICIARY ? AND TO WHOM ?
For poor people the courts and justice are forbidden fruits.
We should find the way out to get the judicial proceedings done without money and without any advocate.
THEN IT WILL BECOME THE COURTS IN DEMOCRATIC INDIA WHERE EVEN POOR PEOPLE CAN HAVE JUSTICE.
WE HAVE TO REACH TO A JUDICIAL SYSTEM FREE FROM ANY ADVOCATE OR MEDIATOR.
LIC friends please give your valuable opinion as to how can it be done ???
JUDICIARY FOR ALL INDIANS OR SALE JUSTICE TO CUSTOMER?
It is a democratic right of citizens of a democratic state to have equal justice from the state and it is the duty of a judiciary of a democratic state to serve the justice equally to all the citizens.
It is an affair of the democratic state to provide justice to all the citizens irrespective of their status.
It is the only affair of the judiciary in a democratic state to provide justice to all the citizens free from any barring.
IS THIS HAPPENED IN OUR DEMOCRATIC INDIA ?
JUSTICE IS ON SALE TO THOSE WHO CAN BUY ?
IS THIS NOT A; JUDICIAL COMPANY (P) LTD. ?
WHERE ARE THE DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS OF INDIAN CITIZENS IN JUDICIARY ???
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR JUSTICE?
Isn’t it? That JUSTICE IS THE PRINCIPLE DEMOCRATIC RIGHT
DEMOCRACY MEANS - EQUAL JUSTICE
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY - MEANS DEMOCRACY
What is going on in practice ??
WHO CAN PAY THE FEES AND CAN BEAR THE EXPENSES
THEY CAN ONLY HAVE OPPORTUNITY
IS DEMOCRACY IMPLEMENTED ????????
What do you think ?
“RIGHT TO JUSTICE ACT” ? Like RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT !!
“RIGHT TO JUSTICE ACT” ?
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT !!
“JISTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED”
IT IS UNREPAIRABLE.
People of Democratic India ever have the Right To Information as a part of their Democratic Rights. But, the Bureaucrats have broken it under a false shelter of Official Secret Act 1923 which was actually gone died on 26 January 1950. Therefore, now the RTI Act 2005 come into existence to penalize the public servants who deny information to any citizen within time frame and for its mean every citizen can have all the information within their individual capacity whatever the information a Legislative Assembly or Parliament can call.
Is there feasibility for “RIGHT TO JUSTICE ACT” like “RTI Act 2005” to penalise the judges (Public Servants) who do not provide justice (decision) within a time frame???
At the END - A SAD JOKE
Sonmalani become THE LAWYER by MANAGING the DEGREE of LLB from a SETH DHANWAN LAW COLLEGE and further MANAGEMENT by Fathermalani.
One day the new Adv. Mr. Sonmalani returned home in evening after his first day in court where he WON the case in his first argument and was trying to give surprise to Adv. Mr. fathermalani stating that; Hey ! I WON that case which you were fighting since my childhood !!!!!!!
Adv. Mr. Fathermalani made him surprised by shooting a sure shot by his left hand on the right cheek of newly become advocate Mr. Sonmalani and fired him that; YOU FOOL ! I made you an Advocate by grabbing money from that client and kept him in my grip for years and YOU FOOL in first day let him go away ??????????????????